Navalyze · Container · Ship

ELBIA

IMO: 9326990
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,805 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St. John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ANALENA, NCL AVEROY, NCL AVERØY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,805 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

72.7

Container median 177 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

47.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+194%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,471 t

CO₂ emitted

14,156 t

14,375 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

61,460 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,833 h

201 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.7 kg/nm · median 177 (−59%)

78.8Ranks 135 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.7 kn · median 13.3 (−5%)

9.1Faster than 41% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 47.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+194%)

7.22Ranks 2,000 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU6%

98% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (13,851 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

817 t

5.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+219 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ELBIA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ELBIA
Container median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELBIA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	+0%	−9%	−17%	+8%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+1%	−2%	−4%	−5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+1%	+0%	+2%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−1%	−0%	+14%	+28%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−5%	−1%	+22%	−24%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+9.8 kn	−8%	+206%	+276%	+16%	9.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+24%	+5%	−39%	+35%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG	4,471	14,156	61,460	4,833	12.7	72.7	47.9	–
2024	DT-Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	5,381	17,050	74,071	5,278	14.0	72.6	44.3	–
2023	not published	5,551	17,686	76,844	5,308	14.5	72.2	46.5	–
2022	not published	5,354	17,006	75,105	5,134	14.6	71.3	62.4	–
2021	not published	4,729	15,127	65,722	4,523	14.5	72.0	49.0	–
2020	not published	4,087	13,013	53,848	3,858	14.0	75.9	64.7	–
2019	not published	1,176	3,671	14,309	3,407	4.2	82.2	55.9	–
2018	not published	1,546	4,828	23,355	4,693	5.0	66.2	41.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG	47.9	16.3	+194%	2,000 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024	DT-Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	44.3	17.5	+153%	1,674 of 1,974	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	46.5	19.4	+139%	1,637 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	62.4	19.1	+226%	1,734 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	49.0	17.9	+174%	1,589 of 1,781	RINA	–
2020	not published	64.7	17.6	+268%	1,718 of 1,797	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	55.9	18.9	+196%	1,620 of 1,788	RINA	A+B
2018	not published	41.3	20.2	+104%	1,371 of 1,705	RINA	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.