Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SPAR LIBRA

IMO: 9328534
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 38,236 t
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.27 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spar Shipping A/S

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 38,236 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

93.4

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.66

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−3%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,759 t

CO₂ emitted

5,516 t

5,603 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

18,835 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,773 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 93.4 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+13%)

61.0Ranks 2,578 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 10.7 (−1%)

8.8Faster than 48% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.66 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−3%)

4.80Ranks 1,708 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU25%
Into the EU62%
At berth in the EU4%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,125 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

212 t

3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+87 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SPAR LIBRA
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SPAR LIBRA
Bulk carrier median

9.510.010.511.011.512.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SPAR LIBRA
Bulk carrier median

6.07.08.09.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+4%	+14%	+4%	+7%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	+0%	−13%	−3%	−2%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−4%	−5%	+80%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−10%	−14%	−38%	−15%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.7 kn	+7%	+25%	+258%	−5%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+5%	+1%	−79%	+31%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−9%	−11%	+16%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spar Shipping A/S	1,759	5,516	18,835	1,773	10.6	93.4	7.66	–
2024	Spar Shipping A/S	1,632	5,106	18,150	1,883	9.6	89.9	7.15	–
2023	not published	1,690	5,300	18,798	1,697	11.1	89.9	7.30	92%
2022	not published	972	3,056	10,416	928	11.2	93.3	7.31	–
2021	not published	1,758	5,496	16,892	1,451	11.6	104.1	8.63	–
2020	not published	461	1,455	4,719	475	9.9	97.7	9.10	–
2019	not published	2,107	6,590	22,695	2,203	10.3	92.8	6.93	–
2018	not published	1,985	6,206	19,498	1,855	10.5	101.8	8.86	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spar Shipping A/S	7.66	7.89	−3%	1,708 of 3,610	DNV	B+C
2024	Spar Shipping A/S	7.15	8.09	−12%	1,146 of 3,089	DNV	C
2023	not published	7.30	8.27	−12%	1,352 of 3,548	ABS	C
2022	not published	7.31	8.71	−16%	1,298 of 3,968	ABS	C
2021	not published	8.63	8.57	+1%	1,757 of 3,466	ABS	C
2020	not published	9.10	8.24	+10%	1,906 of 3,150	ABS	C
2019	not published	6.93	8.38	−17%	1,082 of 3,360	ABS	C
2018	not published	8.86	8.50	+4%	1,834 of 3,384	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.