Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LUCITA

IMO: 9338113
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SARA PRIMA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Amisco Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

37.3

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+6%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

22.0

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (−14%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,634 t

CO₂ emitted

5,238 t

5,318 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,838 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,653 h

194 days, 53% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 37.3 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+6%)

17.4Ranks 1,454 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 9.3 (+1%)

6.9Faster than 52% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 22.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−14%)

10.2Ranks 1,016 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports80%
From the EU2%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU12%

96% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,020 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

635 t

12.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+80 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LUCITA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LUCITA
General cargo median

8.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

LUCITA
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−3%	+0%	+35%	−10%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+17%	+15%	−19%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−8%	−4%	+1%	−4%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+0%	−4%	−7%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−16%	−23%	+61%	−30%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	−15%	−3%	−3%	−24%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+5%	−2%	−11%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Amisco Ltd	1,634	5,238	43,838	4,653	9.4	37.3	–	–
2024	Amisco Ltd	1,256	4,026	32,588	3,598	9.1	38.5	–	–
2023	not published	1,326	4,252	40,439	4,372	9.3	32.8	–	–
2022	not published	1,425	4,569	40,006	4,502	8.9	35.6	–	–
2021	not published	1,531	4,907	43,137	4,673	9.2	35.5	66.8	–
2020	not published	1,136	3,642	26,721	2,658	10.1	42.5	32.4	100%
2019	not published	1,374	4,319	27,592	3,120	8.8	49.8	42.4	–
2018	not published	1,460	4,583	30,861	3,248	9.5	47.3	0.60	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Amisco Ltd	22.0	25.5	−14%	1,016 of 2,723	DNV	B+C
2024	Amisco Ltd	24.4	19.3	+27%	759 of 1,111	DNV	B
2023	not published	22.4	20.7	+8%	598 of 1,045	RINA	A
2022	not published	23.3	21.6	+8%	578 of 1,034	RINA	A
2021	not published	22.6	22.7	−0%	564 of 1,142	RINA	A
2020	not published	32.4	24.5	+32%	855 of 1,167	RINA	B
2019	not published	42.4	25.0	+70%	953 of 1,154	RINA	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.