Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Amisco Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Amisco Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 8 |
| CO₂ emitted | 41,376 t−3.0% |
| Fuel kg/nm | 36.2 |
| Average speed | 10.1 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 8.8% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | General cargo |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5
- Amisco Ltd28.2 (+11% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin general cargo | CO₂ per transport work (dwt)g/dwt·nm, median ship | vs general cargo medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amisco Ltd | 7 | 28.2 | +11% | 33.8 | 10.0 | 4,411 | 10.2% | – |
| Segment median | 25.5 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Amisco Ltd47.3 (+190% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin container | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs container medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amisco Ltd | 1 | 47.3 | +190% | 52.3 | 10.7 | 4,418 | 2.8% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amisco Ltd | DNV (8) | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% |
Amisco Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIRITA | 9108063 | Container | 47.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +190% | 10.7 | 7,782 t | €293k | €16k |
| DANITA | 9341108 | General cargo | 46.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +82% | 10.5 | 6,782 t | €356k | €161k |
| ADRIATA | 9005376 | General cargo | 39.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +53% | 10.0 | 4,374 t | €224k | €78k |
| MERITA | 8422034 | General cargo | 35.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +40% | 10.7 | 4,011 t | €211k | €60k |
| NAVITA | 8324737 | General cargo | 28.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +11% | 10.9 | 4,144 t | €218k | €21k |
| BEATA | 9053828 | General cargo | 23.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −7% | 10.0 | 4,319 t | €227k | €0 |
| EVITA | 9381433 | General cargo | 23.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −7% | 8.8 | 4,727 t | €220k | €0 |
| LUCITA | 9338113 | General cargo | 22.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −14% | 9.4 | 5,238 t | €264k | €0 |
30 of 8 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.