Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

EVITA

IMO: 9381433
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Amisco Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

40.0

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+14%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

23.6

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (−7%)

Average speed

8.8 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,474 t

CO₂ emitted

4,727 t

4,799 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

36,825 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,194 h

175 days, 48% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 40.0 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+14%)

17.4Ranks 1,560 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 8.8 kn · median 9.3 (−5%)

6.9Faster than 37% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 23.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−7%)

10.2Ranks 1,155 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports72%
From the EU10%
Into the EU7%
At berth in the EU11%

89% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,192 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

506 t

10.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+72 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVITA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVITA
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

EVITA
General cargo median

17.520.022.525.027.530.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−6%	+1%	+3%	−7%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	−1%	−9%	−2%	−8%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−1%	−3%	−1%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	+19%	+21%	−27%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+2%	+11%	+6%	−14%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+1%	+4%	+3%	+9%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−4%	+3%	+17%	−21%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Amisco Ltd	1,474	4,727	36,825	4,194	8.8	40.0	–	–
2024	Amisco Ltd	1,523	4,827	35,839	4,382	8.2	42.5	–	–
2023	not published	1,566	4,966	36,396	4,118	8.8	43.0	–	–
2022	not published	1,600	5,078	36,901	4,065	9.1	43.4	–	–
2021	not published	1,847	5,841	50,586	5,718	8.8	36.5	–	–
2020	not published	1,699	5,327	47,535	5,790	8.2	35.7	24.1	–
2019	not published	1,637	5,198	46,349	5,908	7.8	35.3	24.6	–
2018	not published	1,451	4,652	39,493	5,377	7.3	36.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Amisco Ltd	23.6	25.5	−7%	1,155 of 2,723	DNV	B+C
2024	Amisco Ltd	25.5	19.3	+33%	804 of 1,111	DNV	B
2023	not published	27.9	20.7	+35%	777 of 1,045	RINA	A
2022	not published	25.8	21.6	+19%	658 of 1,034	RINA	A
2021	not published	20.6	22.7	−9%	474 of 1,142	RINA	A
2020	not published	24.0	24.5	−2%	555 of 1,167	RINA	A
2019	not published	21.9	25.0	−12%	430 of 1,154	RINA	A
2018	not published	27.9	24.9	+12%	617 of 1,044	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.