Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

DANITA

IMO: 9341108
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: DANTE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Amisco Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

42.1

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+20%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

46.4

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+82%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,116 t

CO₂ emitted

6,782 t

6,886 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

50,217 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,796 h

200 days, 55% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 42.1 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+20%)

17.4Ranks 1,653 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 9.3 (+13%)

6.9Faster than 72% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 46.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+82%)

10.2Ranks 2,385 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,782 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

413 t

6.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+104 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DANITA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DANITA
General cargo median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

DANITA
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−0%	+2%	+7%	+2%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−3%	−7%	+3%	−11%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−3%	−7%	−16%	+8%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−9%	−6%	+26%	+17%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.5 kn	−14%	+1%	+1%	−31%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	+24%	+38%	−5%	+0%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 24%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−1%	−11%	+1%	+89%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Amisco Ltd	2,116	6,782	50,217	4,796	10.5	42.1	–	–
2024	Amisco Ltd	1,988	6,374	47,024	4,599	10.2	42.3	–	–
2023	not published	1,988	6,337	45,506	4,262	10.7	43.7	–	–
2022	not published	2,444	7,727	54,274	4,874	11.1	45.0	–	–
2021	not published	2,136	6,742	43,031	4,014	10.7	49.6	–	–
2020	not published	2,446	7,680	42,601	4,606	9.2	57.4	–	–
2019	not published	2,075	6,592	44,926	5,429	8.3	46.2	48.6	–
2018	not published	2,082	6,556	44,396	4,870	9.1	46.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Amisco Ltd	46.4	25.5	+82%	2,385 of 2,723	DNV	B+C
2024	Amisco Ltd	45.5	19.3	+136%	1,028 of 1,111	DNV	B
2023	not published	51.0	20.7	+147%	984 of 1,045	RINA	A
2022	not published	47.4	21.6	+120%	949 of 1,034	RINA	A
2021	not published	40.3	22.7	+78%	1,014 of 1,142	RINA	A
2020	not published	58.6	24.5	+139%	1,084 of 1,167	RINA	A
2019	not published	58.3	25.0	+133%	1,055 of 1,154	RINA	A
2018	not published	30.8	24.9	+24%	689 of 1,044	Korean Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.