Navalyze · Container · Ship

ELBSPRINTER

IMO: 9349215
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,741 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 28.25 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ASTROSPRINTER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS Elblaeufer GmbH

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,741 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

77.5

Container median 177 kg/nm (−56%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

50.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+212%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,775 t

CO₂ emitted

11,732 t

11,918 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

48,704 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,986 h

166 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 77.5 kg/nm · median 177 (−56%)

78.8Ranks 201 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 33% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 50.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+212%)

7.22Ranks 2,034 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports87%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU13%

93% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,950 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,474 t

12.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+186 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ELBSPRINTER
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ELBSPRINTER
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELBSPRINTER
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+6%	+7%	−8%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+12%	+14%	−22%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	+9%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−12%	−14%	+0%	+19%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+3%	+3%	−15%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+0%	−5%	−2%	+3%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−0%	+5%	+13%	+20%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS Elblaeufer GmbH	3,775	11,732	48,704	3,986	12.2	77.5	50.8	–
2024	MS Elblaeufer GmbH	3,850	12,021	52,929	4,346	12.2	72.8	51.0	–
2023	not published	4,413	13,887	67,712	5,668	11.9	65.2	61.1	–
2022	not published	4,004	12,677	62,337	5,236	11.9	64.2	60.1	–
2021	not published	4,514	14,255	62,177	5,041	12.3	72.6	50.7	–
2020	not published	5,166	16,311	73,187	5,930	12.3	70.6	61.2	–
2019	not published	5,263	16,565	74,896	5,748	13.0	70.3	59.3	–
2018	not published	4,663	14,699	66,052	5,364	12.3	70.6	49.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS Elblaeufer GmbH	50.8	16.3	+212%	2,034 of 2,208	EnvService	B
2024	MS Elblaeufer GmbH	51.0	17.5	+191%	1,769 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	61.1	19.4	+215%	1,795 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	60.1	19.1	+214%	1,712 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	50.7	17.9	+183%	1,612 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	61.2	17.6	+248%	1,700 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	59.3	18.9	+214%	1,647 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	49.4	20.2	+144%	1,477 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.