Navalyze · Container · Ship

NJORD

IMO: 9349227
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 2,875 t
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Sneek
Technical efficiency: EEXI 28.41 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ASTRORUNNER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Visser Shipping BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,875 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

74.1

Container median 177 kg/nm (−58%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

80.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+394%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,953 t

CO₂ emitted

18,610 t

18,902 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

80,369 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,962 h

248 days, 68% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 74.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−58%)

78.8Ranks 157 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 52% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 80.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+394%)

7.22Ranks 2,188 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports50%
From the EU24%
Into the EU25%
At berth in the EU1%

32% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,927 t).

Fuel burned laden

5,953 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

277 t

1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+292 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NJORD
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NJORD
Container median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NJORD
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+3.6 kn	−7%	+26%	+25%	+54%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.4 kn	+16%	−13%	+6%	−27%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−10%	−3%	+26%	+21%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	−0.3 kn	+5%	+3%	−31%	−6%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+0%	+20%	+19%	−2%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	−8%	−25%	−0%	+22%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Visser Shipping BV	5,953	18,610	80,369	5,962	13.5	74.1	80.6	100%
2024	Visser Shipping BV	5,142	16,050	64,368	6,481	9.9	79.9	52.4	100%
2023	not published	4,169	13,011	60,718	4,561	13.3	68.7	72.2	–
2022	not published	3,697	11,568	48,294	3,951	12.2	76.6	59.8	–
2020	not published	5,112	16,154	70,020	5,620	12.5	73.0	63.5	–
2019	not published	4,283	13,523	58,660	5,650	10.4	73.0	65.0	–
2018	not published	4,677	14,602	58,850	4,627	12.7	79.5	53.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Visser Shipping BV	80.6	16.3	+394%	2,188 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	Visser Shipping BV	52.4	17.5	+199%	1,794 of 1,974	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	72.2	19.4	+272%	1,857 of 1,899	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	59.8	19.1	+212%	1,708 of 1,825	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	63.5	17.6	+261%	1,707 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	65.0	18.9	+244%	1,693 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	53.1	20.2	+162%	1,523 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.