Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC MONTEREY V

IMO: 9349796
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 35,267 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EIV 18.44 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC MONTEREY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bradamante Oceanway Limited

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,267 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

191

Container median 177 kg/nm (+8%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+5%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

67.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,875 t

CO₂ emitted

40,732 t

41,364 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

67,542 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,614 h

192 days, 53% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 191 kg/nm · median 177 (+8%)

78.8Ranks 1,212 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 13.3 (+10%)

9.1Faster than 71% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+5%)

7.22Ranks 1,168 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports34%
From the EU33%
Into the EU29%
At berth in the EU4%

69% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (27,911 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,438 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+632 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC MONTEREY V
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC MONTEREY V
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC MONTEREY V
Container median

15.017.520.022.525.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+10%	+12%	+655%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	−2.5 kn	−33%	−43%	−25%	−17%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 33%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	+18%	+23%	−67%	+8%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	−5%	+3%	−17%	−21%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+11%	+18%	−8%	+17%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	+1%	+4%	+31%	−7%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bradamante Oceanway Limited	12,875	40,732	67,542	4,614	14.6	191	17.1	–
2024	Bradamante Oceanway Limited	1,554	4,913	8,949	624	14.3	174	17.5	–
2022	not published	3,099	9,785	11,997	713	16.8	258	21.2	98%
2021	not published	8,016	25,276	36,475	2,265	16.1	220	19.7	97%
2020	not published	10,173	32,089	43,838	2,959	14.8	232	24.8	–
2019	not published	9,971	31,104	47,702	3,408	14.0	209	21.2	–
2018	not published	7,579	23,630	36,509	2,696	13.5	208	22.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bradamante Oceanway Limited	17.1	16.3	+5%	1,168 of 2,208	EnvService	C
2024	Bradamante Oceanway Limited	17.5	17.5	+0%	989 of 1,974	EnvService	C
2022	not published	21.2	19.1	+11%	998 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	19.7	17.9	+10%	978 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	24.8	17.6	+41%	1,217 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	21.2	18.9	+12%	1,008 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	22.7	20.2	+12%	963 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.