Navalyze · Container · Ship

LINDA

IMO: 9354325
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,864 t
Port of registry: Pikis
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Langh Ship Oy Ab

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,864 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

81.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−54%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

52.46

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+222%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,562 t

CO₂ emitted

17,349 t

17,623 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

67,992 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,400 h

225 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 81.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−54%)

78.8Ranks 272 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 13.3 (−5%)

9.1Faster than 39% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 52.46 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+222%)

7.22Ranks 2,053 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports72%
From the EU19%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU3%

71% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (12,350 t).

Fuel burned laden

100%

0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LINDA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LINDA
Container median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LINDA
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−7%	−10%	−14%	−7%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	+11%	+16%	+15%	+9%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−3%	−3%	+27%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	+15%	−3%	−33%	+10%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−7%	−3%	−9%	−3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+2%	+6%	−3%	+8%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−1%	−3%	−1%	+17%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Langh Ship Oy Ab	5,562	17,349	67,992	5,400	12.6	81.8	52.46	100%
2024	Langh Ship Oy Ab	7,005	21,838	79,211	6,131	12.9	88.4	56.42	–
2023	not published	5,516	17,207	69,108	5,615	12.3	79.8	51.88	–
2022	not published	4,474	13,977	54,489	4,425	12.3	82.1	53.39	–
2021	not published	5,828	18,166	81,672	5,580	14.6	71.4	48.45	–
2020	not published	6,883	21,457	89,773	6,387	14.1	76.7	49.92	–
2019	not published	6,927	21,593	92,522	6,806	13.6	74.9	46.07	–
2018	not published	7,013	21,858	93,073	6,684	13.9	75.3	39.54	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Langh Ship Oy Ab	52.46	16.30	+222%	2,053 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	Langh Ship Oy Ab	56.42	17.52	+222%	1,832 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	51.88	19.40	+167%	1,709 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	53.39	19.13	+179%	1,650 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	48.45	17.90	+171%	1,587 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	49.92	17.58	+184%	1,596 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	46.07	18.88	+144%	1,498 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	39.54	20.22	+96%	1,340 of 1,705	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.