Navalyze · Container · Ship

ANDROMEDA J

IMO: 9355422
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 2,924 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.25 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "Andromeda J" Shipping GmbH & Co.KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,924 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

73.4

Container median 177 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

78.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+384%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,169 t

CO₂ emitted

16,243 t

16,497 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

70,386 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,610 h

234 days, 64% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 73.4 kg/nm · median 177 (−59%)

78.8Ranks 148 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 13.3 (−6%)

9.1Faster than 38% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 78.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+384%)

7.22Ranks 2,182 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (16,243 t).

Fuel burned laden

5,169 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

768 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+254 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANDROMEDA J
Container median

0.05,000,00010,000,00015,000,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ANDROMEDA J
Container median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ANDROMEDA J
Container median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+12.5 kn	−100%	−5%	–	−34%	12.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 100%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−12.7 kn	+18,194,255%	+8%	−100%	+79%	12.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18,194,255%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	+8%	−4%	−35%	−22%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+2%	+0%	+298%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+4.4 kn	−26%	+4%	−8%	+56%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−3%	+1%	−34%	+20%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−3%	−10%	−6%	+4%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS "Andromeda J" Shipping GmbH & Co.KG	5,169	16,243	70,386	5,610	12.5	73.4	78.9	100%
2024	MS "ANDROMEDA J" Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	4,860	15,276	0	5,023	0.0	12,790,632	120	–
2023	not published	4,349	13,586	61,843	4,852	12.7	70.3	67.0	–
2022	not published	6,173	19,468	94,469	6,575	14.4	65.3	86.2	–
2021	not published	1,517	4,801	23,750	1,615	14.7	63.9	106	–
2020	not published	2,239	7,177	25,778	2,491	10.3	86.8	68.1	–
2019	not published	3,535	11,253	39,323	3,956	9.9	89.9	56.7	–
2018	not published	3,888	12,175	42,001	3,909	10.7	92.6	54.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "Andromeda J" Shipping GmbH & Co.KG	78.9	16.3	+384%	2,182 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	MS "ANDROMEDA J" Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	120	17.5	+583%	1,968 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	67.0	19.4	+245%	1,821 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	86.2	19.1	+351%	1,807 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	106	17.9	+492%	1,776 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	68.1	17.6	+287%	1,738 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	56.7	18.9	+201%	1,624 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	54.8	20.2	+171%	1,536 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.