Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

EKFJORD

IMO: 9356622
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 10,114 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Arendal
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.52 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Ekships AB

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,114 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

76.6

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

24.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+60%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,767 t

CO₂ emitted

8,799 t

8,935 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

36,143 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,588 h

150 days, 41% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 76.6 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−4%)

52.8Ranks 638 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 11.1 (−9%)

8.8Faster than 25% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+60%)

7.93Ranks 1,061 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU27%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU9%

70% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,164 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

780 t

8.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+136 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EKFJORD
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EKFJORD
Chemical tanker median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EKFJORD
Chemical tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−10%	−14%	−1%	−23%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+20%	+20%	−31%	+34%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	+0%	−3%	+4%	−11%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+10%	+6%	−7%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	−11%	−11%	+1%	−16%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.6 kn	+4%	+53%	+9%	+7%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−4%	−11%	+11%	−7%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Ekships AB	2,767	8,799	36,143	3,588	10.1	76.6	24.1	–
2024	Ekships AB	3,120	9,959	36,628	3,496	10.5	85.2	31.3	–
2023	not published	3,760	12,054	53,035	5,047	10.5	70.9	23.4	–
2022	not published	3,618	11,598	51,032	4,700	10.9	70.9	26.2	–
2021	not published	3,561	11,417	55,043	4,899	11.2	64.7	25.2	–
2020	not published	3,939	12,629	54,387	4,832	11.3	72.4	30.1	–
2019	not published	3,485	11,172	50,113	6,522	7.7	69.5	28.2	–
2018	not published	3,248	10,413	45,031	5,417	8.3	72.1	30.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Ekships AB	24.1	15.0	+60%	1,061 of 1,460	DNV	C
2024	Ekships AB	31.3	16.7	+87%	1,012 of 1,274	DNV	C
2023	not published	23.4	16.2	+44%	895 of 1,314	DNV	C
2022	not published	26.2	8.51	+208%	1,781 of 1,961	DNV	C
2021	not published	25.2	8.86	+185%	1,612 of 1,789	DNV	C
2020	not published	30.1	9.03	+234%	1,728 of 1,870	DNV	C
2019	not published	28.2	8.83	+220%	1,775 of 1,919	DNV	C
2018	not published	30.3	8.86	+242%	1,663 of 1,779	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.