Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

DANTE A

IMO: 9361029
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,966 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Catania
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.15 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: DANTE A.

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARITTIMA ETNEA S.r.l.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,966 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

80.2

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

64.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+329%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,673 t

CO₂ emitted

8,537 t

8,668 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

33,330 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,152 h

131 days, 36% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 80.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+1%)

52.8Ranks 746 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 11.1 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 35% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 64.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+329%)

7.93Ranks 1,424 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports85%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU15%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,537 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,258 t

14.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+131 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DANTE A
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DANTE A
Chemical tanker median

2.55.07.510.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DANTE A
Chemical tanker median

0.050.0100150

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+2%	+4%	+7%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−4%	−8%	+12%	−16%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+8%	+6%	−7%	+23%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−27%	−33%	+18%	−51%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.9 kn	−12%	+17%	−0%	–	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+6.7 kn	−13%	+220%	+41%	–	6.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.9 kn	+59%	−9%	−38%	–	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 59%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MARITTIMA ETNEA S.r.l.	2,673	8,537	33,330	3,152	10.6	80.2	64.6	–
2024	MARITTIMA ETNEA S.r.l.	2,445	7,697	31,065	2,982	10.4	78.7	60.6	–
2023	not published	2,267	7,141	27,760	2,557	10.9	81.7	71.9	–
2022	not published	2,248	7,069	29,741	2,683	11.1	75.6	58.2	–
2021	not published	2,607	8,220	25,145	2,071	12.1	104	119	–
2020	not published	2,962	9,346	25,218	2,749	9.2	118	124	–
2019	not published	2,413	7,649	17,861	7,172	2.5	135	168	–
2018	not published	2,436	7,729	28,609	6,568	4.4	85.2	105	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MARITTIMA ETNEA S.r.l.	64.6	15.0	+329%	1,424 of 1,460	RINA	B
2024	MARITTIMA ETNEA S.r.l.	60.6	16.7	+262%	1,232 of 1,274	RINA	B
2023	not published	71.9	16.2	+343%	1,289 of 1,314	RINA	B
2022	not published	58.2	16.1	+262%	1,371 of 1,409	RINA	B
2021	not published	119	16.7	+613%	1,343 of 1,343	RINA	B
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2018	not published	105	17.1	+514%	1,277 of 1,294	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.