Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MAGNIFICA

IMO: 9374234
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 20,147 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Bari
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.54 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Millenia Maritime Inc

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,147 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

119

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+24%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,839 t

CO₂ emitted

12,177 t

12,366 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

32,391 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,835 h

118 days, 32% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 119 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+49%)

52.8Ranks 1,377 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 11.1 (+3%)

8.8Faster than 60% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+24%)

7.93Ranks 895 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports55%
From the EU20%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU17%

86% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,507 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,094 t

17.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+189 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAGNIFICA
Chemical tanker median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAGNIFICA
Chemical tanker median

2.55.07.510.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAGNIFICA
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	−9%	+1%	+10%	−10%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+7.1 kn	−21%	+152%	+38%	−32%	7.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−5.4 kn	+40%	−47%	−46%	−6%	5.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	+5%	−13%	+34%	+46%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	−2%	−6%	+5%	+66%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+1%	+1%	−25%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+2.2 kn	−21%	−1%	+95%	−48%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Millenia Maritime Inc	3,839	12,177	32,391	2,835	11.4	119	18.7	–
2024	Millenia Maritime Inc	3,833	12,059	29,318	2,860	10.3	131	20.7	54%
2023	not published	3,513	11,041	21,236	6,598	3.2	165	30.6	–
2022	not published	4,638	14,660	39,249	4,578	8.6	118	32.7	–
2021	not published	3,291	10,410	29,205	2,846	10.3	113	22.4	–
2020	not published	3,221	10,180	27,887	2,602	10.7	116	13.5	–
2019	not published	4,250	13,357	37,035	3,471	10.7	115	17.4	–
2018	not published	2,768	8,660	19,033	2,244	8.5	145	33.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Millenia Maritime Inc	18.7	15.0	+24%	895 of 1,460	RINA	A
2024	Millenia Maritime Inc	20.7	16.7	+24%	798 of 1,274	RINA	–
2023	not published	30.6	16.2	+89%	1,033 of 1,314	RINA	A
2022	not published	32.7	16.1	+103%	1,169 of 1,409	RINA	A
2021	not published	22.4	16.7	+34%	919 of 1,343	RINA	A
2020	not published	13.5	16.2	−17%	442 of 1,312	RINA	A
2019	not published	17.4	17.3	+1%	667 of 1,321	RINA	A
2018	not published	33.4	17.1	+95%	1,058 of 1,294	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.