Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

PUKA

IMO: 9374973
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: HOLLANDIA, TRINITAS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Grona Shipmanagement GmbH

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

60.7

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+72%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

27.6

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+8%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,795 t

CO₂ emitted

8,747 t

8,884 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

46,060 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,482 h

187 days, 51% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 60.7 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+72%)

17.4Ranks 2,080 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 9.3 (+11%)

6.9Faster than 69% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 27.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+8%)

10.2Ranks 1,558 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU46%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU1%

46% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,990 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

122 t

1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+137 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PUKA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PUKA
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

PUKA
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−6%	−4%	+35%	−28%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.2 kn	+11%	−9%	−17%	+66%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	−1.3 kn	+3%	−6%	−32%	+5%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+4.0 kn	−13%	+23%	+568%	−34%	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+10%	+9%	−71%	+38%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−3.2 kn	−1%	−25%	−44%	+25%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Grona Shipmanagement GmbH	2,795	8,747	46,060	4,482	10.3	60.7	–	–
2024	Grona Shipmanagement GmbH	2,199	6,885	34,219	3,354	10.2	64.3	–	–
2023	not published	2,387	7,548	41,218	3,321	12.4	57.9	–	–
2021	not published	3,394	10,601	60,568	4,436	13.7	56.0	–	–
2020	not published	583	1,869	9,065	934	9.7	64.3	–	–
2019	not published	1,818	5,690	31,056	3,160	9.8	58.5	–	–
2018	not published	3,268	10,227	55,180	4,248	13.0	59.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Grona Shipmanagement GmbH	27.6	25.5	+8%	1,558 of 2,723	DNV	B+C
2024	Grona Shipmanagement GmbH	38.3	19.3	+99%	989 of 1,111	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	23.1	20.7	+12%	626 of 1,045	DNV	A+C
2021	not published	22.1	22.7	−3%	541 of 1,142	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2020	not published	33.7	24.5	+37%	888 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2019	not published	24.4	25.0	−2%	545 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2018	not published	19.4	24.9	−22%	326 of 1,044	Bureau Veritas	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.