Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

Grona Shipmanagement GmbH
Ships5
CO₂ emitted33,802 t
Fuel kg/nm54.4
Average speed11.2 kn
CO₂ at berth4.8%
Ships burning LNG0
Ships using alternative fuel0
Main segmentGeneral cargo

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 19.3

  • Grona Shipmanagement GmbH27.6 (+43%)
  • ← betterworse →
Shipsin general cargoCO₂ per transport work (dwt)g/dwt·nm, median shipvs general cargo medianlower is betterFuel kg/nmfleet avg.Average speedknots at seaHours at seaper ship per yearCO₂ at berthshareLNG / alt. fuelships
Grona Shipmanagement GmbH327.6+43%46.511.23,8523.1%–
Segment median 19.30%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.09

  • Grona Shipmanagement GmbH10.9 (+35%)
  • ← betterworse →
Shipsin bulk carrierCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median shipvs bulk carrier medianlower is betterFuel kg/nmfleet avg.Average speedknots at seaHours at seaper ship per yearCO₂ at berthshareLNG / alt. fuelships
Grona Shipmanagement GmbH210.9+35%69.211.33,0287.0%–
Segment median 8.090%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Grona Shipmanagement GmbHDNV (5)100%0%100%0%

Grona Shipmanagement GmbH: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSegment medianvs medianAverage speedCO₂AllowancesCost of gap
PUKA9374973General cargo38.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm19.3+99%10.26,885 t€103k€51k
IMAVERE9612325Bulk carrier12.6 g CO₂/t·nm8.09+56%11.48,594 t€152k€0
HELME9504140General cargo27.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm19.3+43%11.25,405 t€162k€49k
LAUNKALNE9504114General cargo24.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm19.3+25%11.96,760 t€201k€41k
ALYTUS9544750Bulk carrier9.21 g CO₂/t·nm8.09+14%11.16,158 t€98k€0

30 of 5 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.