Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LAUNKALNE

IMO: 9504114
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.42 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ARKLOW DUSK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Grona Shipmanagement GmbH

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

36.8

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

20.5

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (−20%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,716 t

CO₂ emitted

5,499 t

5,583 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

46,610 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,076 h

170 days, 47% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 36.8 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+5%)

17.4Ranks 1,430 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 9.3 (+23%)

6.9Faster than 84% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 20.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−20%)

10.2Ranks 866 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,499 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

299 t

5.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+84 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LAUNKALNE
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LAUNKALNE
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

LAUNKALNE
General cargo median

18.020.022.024.026.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−12%	−15%	−8%	−15%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+2%	−3%	+13%	−7%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	+1.1 kn	−11%	−2%	+3%	+13%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−7%	−2%	+5%	−6%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.9 kn	−3%	+32%	+6%	−6%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+19%	+11%	−14%	+43%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Grona Shipmanagement GmbH	1,716	5,499	46,610	4,076	11.4	36.8	–	–
2024	Grona Shipmanagement GmbH	2,122	6,760	50,804	4,270	11.9	41.8	–	–
2023	not published	1,839	5,870	44,769	3,596	12.5	41.1	–	–
2021	not published	1,998	6,344	43,306	3,806	11.4	46.1	22.5	–
2020	not published	2,048	6,512	41,180	3,807	10.8	49.7	–	–
2019	not published	2,006	6,327	38,988	4,915	7.9	51.5	25.7	–
2018	not published	1,944	6,135	45,146	5,298	8.5	43.1	18.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Grona Shipmanagement GmbH	20.5	25.5	−20%	866 of 2,723	DNV	B+C
2024	Grona Shipmanagement GmbH	24.2	19.3	+26%	747 of 1,111	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	25.9	20.7	+25%	725 of 1,045	DNV	A
2021	not published	22.9	22.7	+1%	582 of 1,142	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	24.3	24.5	−1%	572 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	25.7	25.0	+3%	602 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	18.0	24.9	−28%	261 of 1,044	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.