Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SCANDIC

IMO: 9386249
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 4,869 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Aalborg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.74 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: SWAN BALTIC, NORSTAR BALTIC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Alba Tankers ApS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,869 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

65.7

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

43.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+188%)

Average speed

8.8 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,376 t

CO₂ emitted

7,611 t

7,728 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

36,140 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,124 h

172 days, 47% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 65.7 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−18%)

52.8Ranks 391 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 8.8 kn · median 11.1 (−21%)

8.8Faster than 10% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 43.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+188%)

7.93Ranks 1,337 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports87%
From the EU2%
Into the EU2%
At berth in the EU9%

98% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,472 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

709 t

9.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+117 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SCANDIC
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SCANDIC
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SCANDIC
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−7%	−7%	−17%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+3%	−7%	+12%	−14%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−15%	−12%	+36%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+19%	+5%	−25%	+14%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	+7%	+15%	+25%	−9%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−37%	−33%	−21%	−32%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 37%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+23%	+21%	−0%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Alba Tankers ApS	2,376	7,611	36,140	4,124	8.8	65.7	43.3	–
2024	Alba Tankers ApS	3,096	9,785	43,635	5,025	8.7	71.0	38.2	–
2023	not published	2,689	8,497	39,008	4,064	9.6	68.9	44.3	–
2022	not published	2,330	7,429	28,780	3,103	9.3	81.0	38.5	–
2021	not published	2,635	8,448	38,627	3,696	10.5	68.2	33.7	–
2020	not published	1,961	6,273	30,860	3,158	9.8	63.5	36.9	–
2019	not published	3,936	12,430	38,924	4,266	9.1	101	54.4	–
2018	not published	3,209	10,085	39,064	4,236	9.2	82.1	50.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Alba Tankers ApS	43.3	15.0	+188%	1,337 of 1,460	DNV	A
2024	Alba Tankers ApS	38.2	16.7	+128%	1,099 of 1,274	DNV	A+B
2023	not published	44.3	16.2	+173%	1,188 of 1,314	DNV	A+B
2022	not published	38.5	16.1	+140%	1,241 of 1,409	DNV	A+B
2021	not published	33.7	16.7	+102%	1,113 of 1,343	DNV	A+B
2020	not published	36.9	16.2	+128%	1,143 of 1,312	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	54.4	17.3	+214%	1,258 of 1,321	ABS	A+B
2018	not published	50.5	17.1	+195%	1,200 of 1,294	ABS	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.