Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM LAPIS

IMO: 9386495
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 28,500 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.73 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Dioryx Maritime Services Corporation

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,500 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

174

Container median 177 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+17%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

61.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,721 t

CO₂ emitted

27,272 t

27,700 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

50,126 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,426 h

143 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 174 kg/nm · median 177 (−2%)

78.8Ranks 1,082 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 13.3 (+10%)

9.1Faster than 71% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+17%)

7.22Ranks 1,287 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU75%
Into the EU19%
At berth in the EU1%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (14,425 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

344 t

1.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+428 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM LAPIS
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM LAPIS
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM LAPIS
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+2%	+9%	−36%	−4%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+10%	+4%	+11%	−5%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−2.1 kn	+17%	+2%	+874%	−42%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+4.1 kn	−28%	−5%	−62%	+121%	4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−5%	−2%	+16%	+6%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+3%	+10%	−49%	−0%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.7 kn	+20%	−8%	−27%	+28%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Dioryx Maritime Services Corporation	8,721	27,272	50,126	3,426	14.6	174	19.1	–
2024	Dioryx Maritime Services Corporation	13,441	41,954	78,472	5,752	13.6	171	19.9	–
2023	not published	11,016	34,410	70,522	4,903	14.4	156	21.0	–
2022	not published	969	3,020	7,244	440	16.5	134	36.4	–
2021	not published	3,548	11,052	18,983	1,530	12.4	187	16.4	–
2020	not published	3,220	10,056	16,406	1,355	12.1	196	15.6	–
2019	not published	6,109	19,033	32,079	2,827	11.3	190	15.7	–
2018	not published	6,971	21,747	44,096	2,949	15.0	158	12.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Dioryx Maritime Services Corporation	19.1	16.3	+17%	1,287 of 2,208	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Dioryx Maritime Services Corporation	19.9	17.5	+14%	1,131 of 1,974	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	21.0	19.4	+8%	1,041 of 1,899	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	36.4	19.1	+90%	1,424 of 1,825	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	16.4	17.9	−8%	812 of 1,781	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	15.6	17.6	−11%	767 of 1,797	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	15.7	18.9	−17%	697 of 1,788	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	12.3	20.2	−39%	399 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.