Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

TATAKI

IMO: 9410210
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 115,720 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.79 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 115,720 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

175.9 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (+37%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

4.75

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−40%)

Average speed

5.7 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−47%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

924 t

CO₂ emitted

2,890 t

2,935 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

5,257 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

922 h

38 days, 11% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 175.9 kg/nm · median 128.5 (+37%)

76.1Ranks 1,405 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 5.7 kn · median 10.7 (−47%)

8.0Faster than 2% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.75 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−40%)

4.51Ranks 205 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU24%
Into the EU66%
At berth in the EU9%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,581 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

9.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TATAKI
Oil tanker median

100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TATAKI
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TATAKI
Oil tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−47%	−47%	−59%	−46%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 47%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2022	−0.4 kn	+1%	−3%	+139%	−47%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−2.2 kn	−14%	−30%	+27%	+96%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD	924	2,890	5,257	922	5.7	175.9	4.75	–
2024	DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023	not published	840	2,646	7,707	811	9.5	109.1	2.98	–
2022	not published	3,923	12,283	18,894	2,002	9.4	207.6	5.56	–
2019	not published	1,627	5,093	7,896	803	9.8	206.0	10.52	–
2018	not published	1,493	4,687	6,223	519	12.0	240.0	5.36	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD	4.75	7.95	−40%	205 of 1,665	EMICERT	A
2024	DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD	–	–	–	–	EMICERT	A
2023	not published	2.98	8.44	−65%	16 of 1,797	EMICERT	A
2022	not published	5.56	8.51	−35%	357 of 1,961	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	10.52	8.83	+19%	1,222 of 1,919	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	5.36	8.86	−40%	334 of 1,779	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.