Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

PRABHU LAL

IMO: 9416044
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 16,167 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CHEM POLARIS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,167 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

72.1

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−10%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (−7%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−15%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,610 t

CO₂ emitted

5,047 t

5,126 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

22,330 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,364 h

99 days, 27% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−10%)

52.8Ranks 534 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 11.1 (−15%)

8.8Faster than 17% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−7%)

7.93Ranks 656 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU34%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU3%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,866 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

131 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+79 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PRABHU LAL
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRABHU LAL
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PRABHU LAL
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	+31%	+16%	+86%	+16%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	−25%	−7%	+19%	−50%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	−1%	−21%	−71%	+37%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+5%	+3%	−18%	+3%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+0%	−2%	−0%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−8%	−10%	+12%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+10%	+6%	−5%	−5%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd	1,610	5,047	22,330	2,364	9.4	72.1	14.0	–
2024	T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd	659	2,066	11,975	1,128	10.6	55.0	12.1	–
2023	not published	736	2,313	10,045	1,176	8.5	73.2	24.0	–
2022	not published	2,555	8,038	34,630	3,232	10.7	73.8	17.5	–
2021	not published	2,970	9,424	42,170	3,845	11.0	70.4	17.0	–
2020	not published	2,971	9,431	42,262	3,782	11.2	70.3	16.1	–
2019	not published	2,873	9,027	37,644	3,301	11.4	76.3	15.3	–
2018	not published	2,762	8,679	39,736	3,366	11.8	69.5	16.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd	14.0	15.0	−7%	656 of 1,460	DNV	A+C
2024	T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd	12.1	16.7	−28%	403 of 1,274	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	24.0	16.2	+48%	905 of 1,314	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	17.5	16.1	+9%	779 of 1,409	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	17.0	16.7	+2%	693 of 1,343	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	16.1	16.2	−0%	649 of 1,312	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	15.3	17.3	−12%	532 of 1,321	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	16.2	17.1	−6%	581 of 1,294	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.