Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

PRABHU NAND

IMO: 9425980
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 18,327 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: STOLT MEGAMI, WAWASAN BLUEFIN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 18,327 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

62.0

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (−30%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

574 t

CO₂ emitted

1,788 t

1,817 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,267 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

880 h

37 days, 10% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 62.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−22%)

52.8Ranks 304 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 11.1 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 34% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−30%)

7.93Ranks 383 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU100%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU0%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (894 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0 t

0.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+29 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PRABHU NAND
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRABHU NAND
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PRABHU NAND
Chemical tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	−5%	+6%	−82%	−28%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.1 kn	+20%	−1%	+576%	+46%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−23%	−19%	−27%	−27%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	−1.9 kn	+9%	−7%	−51%	+2%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	−7%	+3%	+3%	−29%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.8 kn	−13%	+29%	−18%	−9%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd	574	1,788	9,267	880	10.5	62.0	10.5	–
2024	T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd	3,268	10,281	50,092	5,306	9.4	65.2	14.6	–
2023	not published	402	1,252	7,409	646	11.5	54.2	9.98	–
2022	not published	712	2,245	10,138	933	10.9	70.2	13.6	–
2020	not published	1,331	4,161	20,727	1,622	12.8	64.2	13.3	–
2019	not published	1,404	4,391	20,220	1,750	11.6	69.4	18.8	–
2018	not published	1,965	6,171	24,633	3,165	7.8	79.8	20.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd	10.5	15.0	−30%	383 of 1,460	DNV	A+C
2024	T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd	14.6	16.7	−13%	543 of 1,274	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	9.98	16.2	−39%	210 of 1,314	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	13.6	16.1	−15%	519 of 1,409	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.3	16.2	−18%	429 of 1,312	DNV	C
2019	not published	18.8	17.3	+8%	742 of 1,321	DNV	C
2018	not published	20.7	17.1	+21%	828 of 1,294	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.