Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

LOKHOLMEN

IMO: 9433303
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 5,500 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.81 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,500 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

88.3 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 80.8 kg/nm (+9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

50.95

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.73 (+205%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.0 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,813 t

CO₂ emitted

8,931 t

9,069 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,872 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,863 h

119 days, 33% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 88.3 kg/nm · median 80.8 (+9%)

53.8Ranks 796 of 1,274, lowest first110.8

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 11.0 (+1%)

8.7Faster than 53% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 50.95 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.73 (+205%)

8.47Ranks 1,198 of 1,274, lowest first41.97

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports35%
From the EU31%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU12%

72% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,391 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

12.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LOKHOLMEN
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

LOKHOLMEN
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LOKHOLMEN
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+21%	+24%	−21%	+53%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−8%	−9%	+56%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	+24%	+14%	−37%	+23%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.2 kn	−12%	+8%	+155%	−7%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.8 kn	−14%	+69%	−55%	+9%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	+6%	−11%	+31%	–	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd	2,813	8,931	31,872	2,863	11.1	88.3	50.95	–
2023	not published	2,921	9,280	40,160	3,698	10.9	72.7	33.28	–
2022	not published	2,031	6,471	25,679	2,331	11.0	79.1	42.57	–
2021	not published	2,628	8,377	41,033	3,423	12.0	64.0	34.62	–
2020	not published	1,171	3,699	16,094	1,639	9.8	72.7	37.14	–
2019	not published	3,040	9,578	36,040	7,193	5.0	84.3	33.94	–
2018	not published	2,202	6,944	27,554	4,631	6.0	79.9	39,453,008.52	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd	50.95	16.73	+205%	1,198 of 1,274	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	33.28	16.23	+105%	1,074 of 1,314	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	42.57	16.06	+165%	1,292 of 1,409	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	34.62	16.69	+107%	1,131 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	37.14	16.16	+130%	1,145 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	33.94	17.32	+96%	1,096 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.