Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Norbulk Shipping UK Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 24 |
| CO₂ emitted | 94 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 78 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.5 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 9.7% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd40.3 (+141% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd | 9 | 40.3 | +141% | 76 | 10.6 | 2,357 | 11.7% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd8.0 (−1% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd | 10 | 8.0 | −1% | 76 | 10.5 | 908 | 4.3% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd50.6 (+189% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd | 1 | 50.6 | +189% | 82 | 9.6 | 4,364 | 12.0% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8
- Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd29.3 (−18% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd | 4 | 29.3 | −18% | 126 | 12.0 | 178 | 11.2% | – |
| Segment median | 35.8 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd | Verifavia (24) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VESTHOLMEN | 9421295 | Chemical tanker | 61.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +265% | 11.0 | 2,953 t | €61k | €20k |
| LOKHOLMEN | 9433303 | Chemical tanker | 51.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +205% | 11.1 | 8,931 t | €192k | €37k |
| GULHOLMEN | 9435703 | Chemical tanker | 48.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +191% | 10.4 | 8,883 t | €149k | €23k |
| PEYTON LYNN C | 9295531 | Container | 50.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +189% | 9.6 | 10,925 t | €299k | €20k |
| ASKHOLMEN | 9436381 | Chemical tanker | 42.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +155% | 10.8 | 9,210 t | €232k | €8k |
| KIRKEHOLMEN | 9553402 | Chemical tanker | 40.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +141% | 10.2 | 8,424 t | €183k | €76k |
| SEASTAR EXPLORER | 9498303 | Bulk carrier | 19.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +138% | 6.5 | 1,001 t | €28k | €6k |
| HASSI MESSAOUD 2 | 9295581 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 85.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.8 | +138% | 11.8 | 1,673 t | €27k | €6k |
| YUKA D | 9586710 | Bulk carrier | 18.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +123% | 9.5 | 1,346 t | €32k | €5k |
| RIVER OAK | 9438157 | Chemical tanker | 35.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +115% | 10.1 | 5,351 t | €88k | €0 |
| GOLDEN OAK | 9445655 | Chemical tanker | 31.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +89% | 10.2 | 6,456 t | €114k | €0 |
| SEASTAR TROJAN | 9406116 | Bulk carrier | 11.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +42% | 11.0 | 7,460 t | €130k | €0 |
| ISOLDA D | 9588873 | Bulk carrier | 11.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +40% | 10.8 | 2,518 t | €42k | €6k |
| NOREASTER | 9350642 | Chemical tanker | 23.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +37% | 10.4 | 2,015 t | €34k | €9k |
| GREAT EASTERN | 9298739 | Chemical tanker | 19.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +14% | 12.6 | 1,749 t | €27k | €4k |
| DJANET | 9176369 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 36.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.8 | +1% | 12.7 | 431 t | €7k | €3k |
| SEASTAR VULCAN | 9681900 | Bulk carrier | 8.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −1% | 11.6 | 3,173 t | €52k | €0 |
| SEASTAR ENDEAVOR | 9544748 | Bulk carrier | 7.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −9% | 10.3 | 2,595 t | €40k | €0 |
| SEASTAR AVALON | 9755921 | Bulk carrier | 7.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −11% | 11.2 | 412 t | €6k | €0 |
| SEASTAR VICTORY | 9612246 | Bulk carrier | 6.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −19% | 10.5 | 914 t | €14k | €0 |
| SEASTAR VALIANT | 9462768 | Bulk carrier | 6.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −20% | 10.6 | 1,250 t | €19k | €0 |
| RHOURD ENOUSS | 9284025 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 22.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.8 | −37% | 13.0 | 580 t | €11k | €375 |
| ALRAR | 9284013 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 11.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.8 | −68% | 11.5 | 712 t | €11k | €0 |
30 of 24 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.