Navalyze

Navalyze · Other · Ship

BBC ALASKA

IMO
9453793
Type
General cargo ship
Average cargo carried
285 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Ice class
IA
Former names
COE LENI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Briese Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS Brinkum · part of Briese

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 285 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
53.7
Other median 87.2 kg/nm (−38%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
595
g CO₂/t·nm · Other median 86.7 (+586%)
Average speed
11.7 kn
Other median 10.4 kn (+13%)
Fuel per day at sea
15.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,913 t
CO₂ emitted
6,029 t
6,123 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
35,611 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,039 h
127 days, 35% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2025

Set against all 159 other ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 53.7 kg/nm · median 87.2 (−38%)
47.6Ranks 29 of 159, lowest first161
Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 10.4 (+13%)
5.8Faster than 70% of other ships13.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 595 g CO₂/t·nm · median 86.7 (+586%)
30.8Ranks 143 of 159, lowest first600
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports20%
  • From the EU49%
  • Into the EU28%
  • At berth in the EU4%

26% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,552 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
213 t
3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+94 t
+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • BBC ALASKA
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • BBC ALASKA
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • BBC ALASKA
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.8 kn−16%−22%+18%–0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024−0.5 kn+5%+1%+48%–0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+3.6 kn+2%+41%+10%–3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−3.3 kn+7%−20%−58%–3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−0.3 kn+4%+1%+76%−36%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+1.4 kn−12%−1%−23%+38%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.5 kn+12%+17%−1%−21%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearBriese Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS Brinkum1,0903,43319,7971,76511.255.1––
2025Kontor 17 MPM GmbH1,9136,02935,6113,03911.753.7595–
2024Briese Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS Brinkum1,9486,09830,2772,42412.564.3––
2023not published1,2543,91220,4131,56513.061.424.4–
2022not published1,1083,48018,4791,9579.460.0––
2021not published2,4597,80443,9423,47212.756.0––
2020not published1,3444,28124,9771,91813.053.8––
2019not published1,9886,22132,6212,81911.660.9––
2018not published1,7895,60333,0032,96311.154.2––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOther medianvs OtherRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearBriese Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS Brinkum––––Korean RegisterB
2025Kontor 17 MPM GmbH59586.7+586%143 of 159DNVA+C
2024Briese Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS Brinkum––––Korean RegisterB
2023not published24.493.5−74%12 of 116Korean RegisterB
2022not published––––Korean RegisterB
2021not published19.022.7−16%395 of 1,142Swiss ClimateA
2020not published29.624.5+21%791 of 1,167Swiss ClimateA
2019not published21.425.0−14%405 of 1,154Swiss ClimateA
2018not published27.024.9+9%591 of 1,044Swiss ClimateA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.