Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

CRIMSON QUEEN

IMO: 9465174
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 426 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.79 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARUFLEET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 426 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

282.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

2,087

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

9.7 kn

Fuel per day at sea

65.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

154 t

CO₂ emitted

486 t

494 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

547 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

56 h

2 days, 1% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 85.5 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+1%)

61.8Ranks 1,594 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.6 (+1%)

8.8Faster than 53% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.64 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (−18%)

4.85Ranks 948 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports28%
From the EU59%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU13%

70% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (342 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

63 t

12.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+8 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CRIMSON QUEEN
Bulk carrier median

0.0100.0200.0300.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CRIMSON QUEEN
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CRIMSON QUEEN
Bulk carrier median

5.06.07.08.09.010.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	+230%	+198%	−97%	–	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 230%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−12%	−13%	+8%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−14.7 kn	+1%	−57%	+152%	−40%	14.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+14.0 kn	−7%	+106%	−77%	+26%	14.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+30%	+22%	+119%	+1%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	−14%	+0%	−9%	−3%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MARUFLEET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	154	486	547	56	9.7	282.1	2,087.35	–
2024	MARUFLEET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	1,599	5,026	18,702	1,745	10.7	85.5	6.64	–
2023	not published	1,684	5,327	17,342	1,597	10.9	97.1	5.70	–
2022	not published	662	2,091	6,883	269	25.6	96.1	9.54	–
2021	not published	3,032	9,581	29,477	2,532	11.6	102.9	7.60	–
2020	not published	1,065	3,326	13,488	1,084	12.4	79.0	7.50	–
2019	not published	1,355	4,235	14,752	1,377	10.7	91.8	7.76	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MARUFLEET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+B+C
2024	MARUFLEET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	6.64	8.09	−18%	948 of 3,089	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	5.70	8.27	−31%	639 of 3,548	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	9.54	8.71	+10%	2,329 of 3,968	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	7.60	8.57	−11%	1,258 of 3,466	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	7.50	8.24	−9%	1,269 of 3,150	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	7.76	8.38	−7%	1,431 of 3,360	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.