Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

YASA AQUALINA

IMO: 9469687
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 46,201 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 4.57 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ALPINE AQUALINA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: OCEANGOLD TANKERS INC.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 46,201 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

149

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.06 (+24%)

Average speed

13.0 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (+19%)

Fuel per day at sea

46.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,561 t

CO₂ emitted

11,112 t

11,287 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

23,980 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,848 h

77 days, 21% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 149 kg/nm · median 129 (+15%)

79.5Ranks 1,238 of 1,787, lowest first194

Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 10.9 (+19%)

8.1Faster than 98% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (+24%)

4.44Ranks 1,170 of 1,787, lowest first25.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU49%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU1%

24% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,692 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

86 t

0.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+175 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

YASA AQUALINA
Oil tanker median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

YASA AQUALINA
Oil tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

YASA AQUALINA
Oil tanker median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−12%	−12%	+166%	+23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	+1.3 kn	+6%	+17%	−41%	+41%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.9 kn	−61%	−48%	+225%	−60%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 61%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.0 kn	+186%	+135%	−35%	+183%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 186%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	+2%	−10%	+39%	+6%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-year	OCEANGOLD TANKERS INC.	1,835	5,728	12,113	939	12.9	152	5.17	–
2024	YASA TANKER ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	3,561	11,112	23,980	1,848	13.0	149	10.0	–
2023	not published	1,513	4,739	9,004	693	13.0	168	8.17	–
2021	not published	2,415	7,575	15,216	1,298	11.7	159	5.78	–
2020	not published	1,904	6,066	4,678	529	8.8	407	14.4	–
2019	not published	1,030	3,226	7,248	671	10.8	142	5.07	–
2018	not published	729	2,273	5,227	427	12.3	140	4.80	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	OCEANGOLD TANKERS INC.	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2024	YASA TANKER ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	10.0	8.06	+24%	1,170 of 1,787	ClassNK	A+B
2023	not published	8.17	8.44	−3%	854 of 1,797	DNV	B
2021	not published	5.78	8.86	−35%	372 of 1,789	DNV	B
2020	not published	14.4	9.03	+59%	1,388 of 1,870	DNV	B
2019	not published	5.07	8.83	−43%	263 of 1,919	DNV	B
2018	not published	4.80	8.86	−46%	246 of 1,779	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.