Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

HARBOUR FEATURE

IMO: 9473092
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 8,887 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,887 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

82.1 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

29.27

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+95%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,277 t

CO₂ emitted

10,386 t

10,547 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

39,929 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,929 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 82.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+3%)

52.8Ranks 796 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 11.1 (−8%)

8.8Faster than 27% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 29.27 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+95%)

7.93Ranks 1,165 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports57%
From the EU8%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU9%

82% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,550 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

9.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HARBOUR FEATURE
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HARBOUR FEATURE
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HARBOUR FEATURE
Chemical tanker median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	+6%	−6%	−17%	+21%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+4%	+0%	+54%	−6%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.4 kn	+16%	+47%	+16%	+41%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.6 kn	−3%	+33%	−26%	−24%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−4.6 kn	−8%	−45%	−25%	−7%	4.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.6 kn	+0%	+31%	+51%	+2%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	−4%	−17%	−4%	+21%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	3,277	10,386	39,929	3,929	10.2	82.1	29.27	–
2024	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	3,703	11,743	47,974	4,195	11.4	77.2	24.19	–
2023	not published	2,315	7,296	31,233	2,639	11.8	74.1	25.74	–
2022	not published	1,728	5,475	27,013	2,875	9.4	64.0	18.26	83%
2021	not published	2,400	7,670	36,384	5,349	6.8	66.0	24.07	65%
2020	not published	3,515	11,270	48,791	4,269	11.4	72.0	25.97	–
2019	not published	2,317	7,289	32,334	3,686	8.8	71.7	25.58	–
2018	not published	2,499	7,892	33,512	3,289	10.2	74.6	21.13	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	29.27	15.04	+95%	1,165 of 1,460	DNV	B+C
2024	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	24.19	16.73	+45%	879 of 1,274	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	25.74	16.23	+59%	951 of 1,314	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	18.26	16.06	+14%	809 of 1,409	ABS	A+C
2021	not published	24.07	16.69	+44%	954 of 1,343	ABS	A+B
2020	not published	25.97	16.16	+61%	989 of 1,312	ABS	A+B
2019	not published	25.58	17.32	+48%	967 of 1,321	ABS	A+B
2018	not published	21.13	17.14	+23%	844 of 1,294	ABS	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.