Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SPAR CORONA

IMO: 9497830
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 42,770 t
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.11 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spar Shipping A/S

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 42,770 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

95.4

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.01

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−11%)

Average speed

8.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

434 t

CO₂ emitted

1,363 t

1,384 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

4,545 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

520 h

22 days, 6% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 95.4 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+15%)

61.0Ranks 2,686 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 8.7 kn · median 10.7 (−19%)

8.8Faster than 10% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.01 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−11%)

4.80Ranks 1,365 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU88%
Into the EU11%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (690 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

17 t

1.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+21 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SPAR CORONA
Bulk carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SPAR CORONA
Bulk carrier median

0.05.010.015.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SPAR CORONA
Bulk carrier median

6.07.08.09.010.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.7 kn	+20%	−9%	−77%	−8%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−12%	−12%	−20%	+18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	−6%	−13%	+66%	−25%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+11.5 kn	−18%	+929%	+547%	−10%	11.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−9.7 kn	+26%	−88%	−94%	+24%	9.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 26%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	+4%	−7%	+287%	+1%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spar Shipping A/S	434	1,363	4,545	520	8.7	95.4	7.01	–
2024Bio blend	Spar Shipping A/S	1,568	4,852	19,648	1,716	11.4	79.8	7.63	–
2023	not published	2,227	6,639	24,660	2,140	11.5	90.3	6.49	92%
2022	not published	1,429	4,518	14,882	1,192	12.5	96.0	8.64	–
2021	not published	269	841	2,300	2,300	1.0	117.1	9.60	–
2020	not published	3,400	10,707	36,435	3,416	10.7	93.3	7.72	–
2019	not published	840	2,617	9,408	788	11.9	89.3	7.64	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spar Shipping A/S	7.01	7.89	−11%	1,365 of 3,610	DNV	B+C
2024Bio blend	Spar Shipping A/S	7.63	8.09	−6%	1,350 of 3,089	DNV	C
2023	not published	6.49	8.27	−22%	965 of 3,548	ABS	C
2022	not published	8.64	8.71	−1%	1,956 of 3,968	ABS	C
2021	not published	9.60	8.57	+12%	2,132 of 3,466	ABS	C
2020	not published	7.72	8.24	−6%	1,351 of 3,150	ABS	C
2019	not published	7.64	8.38	−9%	1,368 of 3,360	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.