Navalyze · Container · Ship

ELBWATER

IMO: 9504073
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,813 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.51 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: WES JANINE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "Elbwater" GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,813 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

74.0

Container median 177 kg/nm (−58%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+111%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,136 t

CO₂ emitted

13,131 t

13,334 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

55,913 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,806 h

200 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 74.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−58%)

78.8Ranks 155 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 13.3 (−13%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+111%)

7.22Ranks 1,782 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU11%

96% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (12,663 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,467 t

11.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+203 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ELBWATER
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ELBWATER
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELBWATER
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+2%	−4%	−10%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	−3%	+7%	+14%	+4%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−5%	−7%	+7%	−2%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−8%	−13%	−9%	−1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	+0%	−8%	−9%	−2%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.9 kn	+5%	+48%	+22%	−10%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−5%	−15%	−15%	−1%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS "Elbwater" GmbH & Co. KG	4,136	13,131	55,913	4,806	11.6	74.0	34.5	–
2024	MS "Elbwater" GmbH & Co. KG	4,502	14,127	61,838	5,034	12.3	72.8	34.8	–
2023	not published	4,087	12,980	54,294	4,890	11.1	75.3	33.6	–
2022	not published	4,026	12,699	50,902	4,445	11.5	79.1	34.3	–
2021	not published	4,831	15,199	56,107	4,671	12.0	86.1	34.5	–
2020	not published	5,286	16,861	61,579	4,681	13.2	85.8	35.2	–
2019	not published	4,135	13,121	50,516	5,417	9.3	81.8	39.1	–
2018	not published	5,104	16,221	59,295	5,698	10.4	86.1	39.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "Elbwater" GmbH & Co. KG	34.5	16.3	+111%	1,782 of 2,208	EnvService	B
2024	MS "Elbwater" GmbH & Co. KG	34.8	17.5	+98%	1,544 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	33.6	19.4	+73%	1,424 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	34.3	19.1	+80%	1,387 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	34.5	17.9	+93%	1,402 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	35.2	17.6	+100%	1,411 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	39.1	18.9	+107%	1,405 of 1,788	DNV	–
2018	not published	39.7	20.2	+96%	1,344 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.