Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

UAL BODEWES

IMO: 9542336
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Hoogezand
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.43 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NESCOS SHIPPING BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

41.1

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+17%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

37.2

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+46%)

Average speed

8.4 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

391 t

CO₂ emitted

1,230 t

1,249 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,507 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,134 h

47 days, 13% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 41.1 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+17%)

17.4Ranks 1,612 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 8.4 kn · median 9.3 (−10%)

6.9Faster than 28% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 37.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+46%)

10.2Ranks 2,121 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU55%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU4%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (627 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

44 t

3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+19 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

UAL BODEWES
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

UAL BODEWES
General cargo median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

UAL BODEWES
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.3 kn	+11%	−13%	−72%	−21%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	−1%	−7%	+41%	+134%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+2%	+2%	−14%	+22%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2022	−0.9 kn	−4%	−12%	+185%	−30%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	+1%	+11%	−43%	+15%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	−47%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NESCOS SHIPPING BV	391	1,230	9,507	1,134	8.4	41.1	–	–
2024	NESCOS SHIPPING BV	1,273	3,987	34,378	3,201	10.7	37.0	–	–
2023	not published	909	2,846	24,333	2,134	11.4	37.3	–	–
2022	not published	1,035	3,244	28,432	2,477	11.5	36.4	26.7	98%
2020	not published	378	1,185	9,968	802	12.4	37.9	61.2	–
2019	not published	656	2,060	17,504	1,544	11.3	37.5	47.4	–
2018	not published	1,268	3,977	32,950	2,902	11.4	38.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NESCOS SHIPPING BV	37.2	25.5	+46%	2,121 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	NESCOS SHIPPING BV	47.3	19.3	+146%	1,040 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	20.2	20.7	−2%	503 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	16.5	21.6	−23%	306 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	23.7	24.5	−3%	546 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	20.5	25.0	−18%	372 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	25.5	24.9	+2%	545 of 1,044	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.