Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

UAL TEXAS

IMO: 9542350
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Hoogezand
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NESCOS SHIPPING BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

35.6

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

36.5

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+43%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,247 t

CO₂ emitted

3,909 t

3,970 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

35,022 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,377 h

141 days, 39% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 35.6 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+1%)

17.4Ranks 1,383 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 9.3 (+12%)

6.9Faster than 71% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 36.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+43%)

10.2Ranks 2,099 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU25%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,986 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

95 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+61 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

UAL TEXAS
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

UAL TEXAS
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

UAL TEXAS
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	+85%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	−3%	−10%	+49%	+2%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−2%	−7%	+454%	+42%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	+3%	+6%	−86%	+22%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+10%	+10%	+27%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−7%	−4%	−52%	+18%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	−5%	+3%	+48%	−39%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NESCOS SHIPPING BV	1,247	3,909	35,022	3,377	10.4	35.6	–	–
2024	NESCOS SHIPPING BV	659	2,054	18,883	1,822	10.4	34.9	–	–
2023	not published	458	1,442	12,701	1,139	11.1	36.1	–	–
2022	not published	84	264	2,294	194	11.8	36.8	86.7	100%
2021	not published	598	1,875	16,769	1,470	11.4	35.6	34.6	–
2020	not published	429	1,341	13,217	1,158	11.4	32.5	74.4	–
2019	not published	963	3,015	27,483	2,495	11.0	35.0	37.0	–
2018	not published	687	2,150	18,559	1,840	10.1	37.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NESCOS SHIPPING BV	36.5	25.5	+43%	2,099 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	NESCOS SHIPPING BV	34.8	19.3	+81%	972 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	34.0	20.7	+64%	893 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	23.9	21.6	+11%	602 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	19.6	22.7	−14%	421 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	21.9	24.5	−11%	455 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	18.5	25.0	−26%	293 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	30.2	24.9	+21%	680 of 1,044	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.