Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

LANDEGODE

IMO: 9607370
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ
Technical efficiency: EIV 52.17 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Torghatten Nord AS · part of Torghatten

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

44.4

Ro-pax median 150 kg/nm (−70%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

125

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−78%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,437

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+467%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,384 t

CO₂ emitted

6,471 t

8,159 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

53,717 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,362 h

140 days, 38% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 44.4 kg/nm · median 150 (−70%)

69.3Ranks 20 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 15.8 (+1%)

12.0Faster than 53% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 125 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−78%)

66.8Ranks 90 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,437 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+467%)

48.6Ranks 372 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports99%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU1%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,471 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

33 t

0.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

57.8 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq uplift

+1,688 t

+26.1% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LANDEGODE
Ro-pax median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LANDEGODE
Ro-pax median

15.516.016.517.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

LANDEGODE
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

LANDEGODE
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−3%	−3%	−15%	+91%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+10%	+5%	−15%	−2%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−7%	−2%	+10%	−14%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+8%	+1%	−7%	−32%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−13%	−12%	+14%	+41%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+3%	+7%	−0%	+47%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	2,384	6,471	53,717	3,362	16.0	44.4	–	–
2024LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	2,890	7,811	62,836	3,931	16.0	46.0	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	3,077	8,523	73,630	4,402	16.7	41.8	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	3,010	8,354	66,826	4,215	15.9	45.0	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	3,015	8,350	72,097	4,246	17.0	41.8	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	3,047	8,440	63,407	3,796	16.7	48.0	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	2,966	8,234	63,709	3,924	16.2	46.6	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	125	567	−78%	90 of 408	1,437	253	+467%	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	65.7	547	−88%	46 of 404	1,748	233	+651%	DNV	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	67.4	680	−90%	34 of 386	2,222	234	+850%	DNV	B
2022LNG / alt.	not published	78.5	626	−87%	46 of 394	2,505	253	+890%	DNV	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	115	815	−86%	73 of 377	509	226	+125%	DNV	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	81.5	751	−89%	61 of 387	2,528	217	+1,062%	DNV	B
2019LNG / alt.	not published	55.4	569	−90%	51 of 394	1,768	223	+694%	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.