Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VÆRØY

IMO: 9607382
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ
Technical efficiency: EIV 52.17 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Torghatten Nord AS · part of Torghatten

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

42.5

Ro-pax median 150 kg/nm (−72%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

195

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−66%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,477

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+483%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,046 t

CO₂ emitted

8,199 t

10,449 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

71,747 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,486 h

187 days, 51% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 42.5 kg/nm · median 150 (−72%)

69.3Ranks 17 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 15.8 (+1%)

12.0Faster than 53% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 195 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−66%)

66.8Ranks 119 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,477 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+483%)

48.6Ranks 373 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports99%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU1%

88% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,218 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

47 t

0.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

77.2 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq uplift

+2,250 t

+27.4% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VÆRØY
Ro-pax median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VÆRØY
Ro-pax median

15.015.516.016.5

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

VÆRØY
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

VÆRØY
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−2%	−2%	+4%	+62%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+3%	+4%	+1%	−19%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−8%	−4%	+13%	−14%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+13%	+14%	−7%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	−14%	−17%	+36%	−24%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	+8%	+13%	−19%	+41%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	3,046	8,199	71,747	4,486	16.0	42.5	–	–
2024LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	2,987	8,052	68,977	4,289	16.1	43.3	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	2,874	7,951	68,050	4,299	15.8	42.2	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	2,767	7,664	60,488	3,968	15.2	45.7	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	2,616	7,235	64,817	4,268	15.2	40.4	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,242	6,265	47,690	3,035	15.7	47.0	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	2,577	7,143	59,178	3,944	15.0	43.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	195	567	−66%	119 of 408	1,477	253	+483%	DNV	A
2024LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	121	547	−78%	95 of 404	1,660	233	+613%	DNV	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	149	680	−78%	77 of 386	2,276	234	+873%	DNV	B
2022LNG / alt.	not published	174	626	−72%	94 of 394	2,542	253	+905%	DNV	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	199	815	−76%	95 of 377	545	226	+141%	DNV	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	262	751	−65%	112 of 387	2,442	217	+1,023%	DNV	B
2019LNG / alt.	not published	186	569	−67%	107 of 394	1,595	223	+617%	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.