Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BARØY

IMO: 9607394
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ
Technical efficiency: EIV 66.59 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Torghatten Nord AS · part of Torghatten

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

9.20

Ro-pax median 150 kg/nm (−94%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

101

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−82%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

442

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+75%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

3.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

574 t

CO₂ emitted

1,788 t

1,816 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

62,197 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,351 h

181 days, 50% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 9.20 kg/nm · median 150 (−94%)

69.3Ranks 3 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.3 kn · median 15.8 (−9%)

12.0Faster than 32% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 101 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−82%)

66.8Ranks 75 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 442 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+75%)

48.6Ranks 265 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports99%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU1%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

15 t

0.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+28 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BARØY
Ro-pax median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BARØY
Ro-pax median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

BARØY
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,5002,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

BARØY
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−76%	−76%	+371%	−36%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 76%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+43%	+41%	−67%	−91%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 43%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−4%	+3%	−26%	−21%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	+4%	+12%	−6%	+13%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−0%	−7%	+4%	−9%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	−7%	−11%	−8%	+4%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Torghatten Nord AS	574	1,788	62,197	4,351	14.3	9.20	–	–
2024	Torghatten Nord AS	516	1,609	13,210	925	14.3	39.1	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	1,085	3,068	39,522	2,754	14.4	27.4	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	1,516	4,293	53,180	3,945	13.5	28.5	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	1,541	4,357	56,523	4,521	12.5	27.3	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	1,484	4,201	54,208	4,034	13.4	27.4	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	1,739	4,912	59,204	4,214	14.0	29.4	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Torghatten Nord AS	101	567	−82%	75 of 408	442	253	+75%	DNV	A
2024	Torghatten Nord AS	159	547	−71%	113 of 404	1,935	233	+731%	DNV	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	1,845	680	+171%	353 of 386	1,313	234	+461%	DNV	B
2022LNG / alt.	not published	2,325	626	+271%	375 of 394	1,378	253	+445%	DNV	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	2,063	815	+153%	333 of 377	1,106	226	+389%	DNV	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,260	751	+201%	343 of 387	1,067	217	+391%	DNV	B
2019LNG / alt.	not published	2,168	569	+281%	367 of 394	1,766	223	+694%	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.