Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

LØDINGEN

IMO: 9607409
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ
Technical efficiency: EIV 66.59 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Torghatten Nord AS · part of Torghatten

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

34.8

Ro-pax median 150 kg/nm (−77%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

336

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−41%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,302

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+414%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

552 t

CO₂ emitted

1,722 t

1,763 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

15,881 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,072 h

45 days, 12% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 34.8 kg/nm · median 150 (−77%)

69.3Ranks 8 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 15.8 (−6%)

12.0Faster than 36% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 336 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−41%)

66.8Ranks 154 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,302 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+414%)

48.6Ranks 369 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

25% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (429 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

89 t

5.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+41 t

+2.4% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LØDINGEN
Ro-pax median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LØDINGEN
Ro-pax median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

LØDINGEN
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

LØDINGEN
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+31%	+39%	−75%	+117%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−9%	−11%	+27%	−93%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−5%	+1%	+14%	−10%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	+12%	+21%	−2%	+12%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	−8%	−18%	+32%	−7%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+2%	+3%	−22%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Torghatten Nord AS	552	1,722	15,881	1,072	14.8	34.8	–	–
2024LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	1,706	4,569	64,155	4,625	13.9	26.6	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	1,480	4,196	50,491	3,550	14.2	29.3	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	1,375	3,928	44,462	3,327	13.4	30.9	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	1,252	3,555	45,380	3,652	12.4	27.6	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	1,033	2,931	34,412	2,482	13.9	30.0	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	1,298	3,664	44,317	3,206	13.8	29.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Torghatten Nord AS	336	567	−41%	154 of 408	1,302	253	+414%	DNV	A
2024LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	155	547	−72%	112 of 404	1,061	233	+356%	DNV	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	2,298	680	+238%	363 of 386	1,330	234	+469%	DNV	B
2022LNG / alt.	not published	2,544	626	+306%	379 of 394	1,442	253	+470%	DNV	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	2,269	815	+178%	341 of 377	902	226	+299%	DNV	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,449	751	+226%	347 of 387	1,136	217	+422%	DNV	B
2019LNG / alt.	not published	2,291	569	+303%	369 of 394	1,302	223	+485%	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.