Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

LADY RINA

IMO: 9631383
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 16,449 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Catania
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AMI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ME MARITTIMA EMILIANA SPA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,449 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

98.1

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+26%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,185 t

CO₂ emitted

13,332 t

13,538 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

42,659 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,049 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+23%)

52.8Ranks 1,142 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 11.1 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 34% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+26%)

7.93Ranks 907 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports53%
From the EU13%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU19%

78% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,337 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,530 t

19.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+206 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LADY RINA
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LADY RINA
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LADY RINA
Chemical tanker median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	−8%	+2%	+25%	−1%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	+7%	−6%	−15%	−7%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	+8%	+18%	−2%	+2%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−7%	−8%	+12%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.6 kn	+2%	+21%	+15%	+2%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.1 kn	−11%	−29%	−27%	+28%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.9 kn	+16%	+41%	−6%	+2%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ME MARITTIMA EMILIANA SPA	4,185	13,332	42,659	4,049	10.5	98.1	19.0	–
2024	ME MARITTIMA EMILIANA SPA	3,648	11,472	34,226	3,615	9.5	107	19.3	–
2023	not published	3,991	12,527	40,167	3,712	10.8	99.3	20.7	–
2022	not published	3,780	11,850	41,100	4,139	9.9	92.0	20.3	–
2021	not published	3,639	11,413	36,718	3,647	10.1	99.1	20.7	–
2020	not published	3,097	9,695	31,947	3,778	8.5	96.9	20.4	–
2019	not published	4,759	15,137	43,552	4,106	10.6	109	15.9	–
2018	not published	4,359	13,791	46,134	5,321	8.7	94.5	15.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ME MARITTIMA EMILIANA SPA	19.0	15.0	+26%	907 of 1,460	RINA	B
2024	ME MARITTIMA EMILIANA SPA	19.3	16.7	+15%	750 of 1,274	RINA	B
2023	not published	20.7	16.2	+28%	824 of 1,314	RINA	B
2022	not published	20.3	16.1	+26%	899 of 1,409	RINA	B
2021	not published	20.7	16.7	+24%	876 of 1,343	RINA	B
2020	not published	20.4	16.2	+26%	859 of 1,312	RINA	B
2019	not published	15.9	17.3	−8%	572 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	15.6	17.1	−9%	542 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.