Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

TP AFFINITY

IMO: 9645401
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 65,023 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.99 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AFFINITY V

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Transpetrol TM AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 65,023 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

156

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.54

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−5%)

Average speed

11.7 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

43.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,177 t

CO₂ emitted

13,129 t

13,334 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

26,779 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,284 h

95 days, 26% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 156 kg/nm · median 129 (+21%)

76.1Ranks 1,260 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 10.7 (+9%)

8.0Faster than 81% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−5%)

4.51Ranks 749 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU62%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU4%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,001 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

516 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+205 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TP AFFINITY
Oil tanker median

110.0120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TP AFFINITY
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TP AFFINITY
Oil tanker median

5.06.07.08.09.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	+32%	+38%	−50%	−2%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−8%	−6%	+229%	+0%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	+8%	+24%	−19%	+42%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−11%	−19%	−44%	−11%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	−8%	−8%	−23%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.0 kn	+0%	+39%	−4%	−24%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−2%	−1%	+13%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Transpetrol TM AS	4,177	13,129	26,779	2,284	11.7	156	7.54	–
2024	Transpetrol TM AS	6,312	19,921	53,472	4,746	11.3	118	7.68	–
2023	not published	2,081	6,544	16,273	1,475	11.0	128	7.68	–
2022	not published	2,377	7,441	20,104	2,093	9.6	118	5.41	–
2021	not published	4,752	14,888	35,891	3,382	10.6	132	6.08	–
2020	not published	6,649	20,905	46,420	4,342	10.7	143	6.73	–
2019	not published	6,882	21,656	48,219	6,233	7.7	143	8.86	–
2018	not published	6,269	19,999	42,842	5,616	7.6	146	8.94	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Transpetrol TM AS	7.54	7.95	−5%	749 of 1,665	DNV	C
2024	Transpetrol TM AS	7.68	8.06	−5%	815 of 1,787	DNV	C
2023	not published	7.68	8.44	−9%	775 of 1,797	DNV	C
2022	not published	5.41	8.51	−36%	327 of 1,961	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.08	8.86	−31%	417 of 1,789	DNV	C
2020	not published	6.73	9.03	−25%	512 of 1,870	DNV	C
2019	not published	8.86	8.83	+0%	967 of 1,919	DNV	C
2018	not published	8.94	8.86	+1%	898 of 1,779	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.