Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

Transpetrol TM AS
Ships6
CO₂ emitted47,342 t
Fuel kg/nm108
Average speed11.2 kn
CO₂ at berth6.6%
Ships burning LNG0
Ships using alternative fuel0
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.06

  • Transpetrol TM AS7.59 (−6%)
  • ← betterworse →
Shipsin oil tankerCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median shipvs oil tanker medianlower is betterFuel kg/nmfleet avg.Average speedknots at seaHours at seaper ship per yearCO₂ at berthshareLNG / alt. fuelships
Transpetrol TM AS57.59−6%11111.12,2916.5%–
Segment median 8.060%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • Transpetrol TM AS6.45 (−61%)
  • ← betterworse →
Shipsin chemical tankerCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median shipvs chemical tanker medianlower is betterFuel kg/nmfleet avg.Average speedknots at seaHours at seaper ship per yearCO₂ at berthshareLNG / alt. fuelships
Transpetrol TM AS16.45−61%73.212.68829.9%–
Segment median 16.70%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Transpetrol TM ASDNV (6)0%0%100%0%

Transpetrol TM AS: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSegment medianvs medianAverage speedCO₂AllowancesCost of gap
LUCTOR9479840Oil tanker8.37 g CO₂/t·nm8.06+4%8.63,315 t€59k€0
TP AFFINITY9645401Oil tanker7.68 g CO₂/t·nm8.06−5%11.319,921 t€317k€0
TURMOIL9479838Oil tanker7.59 g CO₂/t·nm8.06−6%12.71,695 t€25k€0
TP SPIRIT9645413Oil tanker6.95 g CO₂/t·nm8.06−14%11.115,310 t€257k€0
TP ENDURANCE9895197Oil tanker6.87 g CO₂/t·nm8.06−15%12.64,532 t€73k€0
TP ENDEAVOUR9835056Chemical tanker6.45 g CO₂/t·nm16.7−61%12.62,569 t€48k€0

30 of 6 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.