Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

AEGEAN VISION

IMO: 9645437
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 68,049 t
Flag (estimated): Greece
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.82 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 68,049 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

142

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.54

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−18%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,341 t

CO₂ emitted

16,748 t

17,010 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

37,633 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,674 h

153 days, 42% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 142 kg/nm · median 129 (+10%)

76.1Ranks 1,059 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)

8.0Faster than 36% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−18%)

4.51Ranks 548 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU35%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU9%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,268 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,542 t

9.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+262 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AEGEAN VISION
Oil tanker median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AEGEAN VISION
Oil tanker median

8.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AEGEAN VISION
Oil tanker median

5.06.07.08.09.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+29%	+32%	+45%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	−5%	−10%	−33%	+24%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−14%	−14%	+100%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−15%	−11%	−37%	−16%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.4 kn	+9%	+25%	+7%	−9%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+3%	+9%	+20%	+7%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−5%	−1%	+41%	+21%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	5,341	16,748	37,633	3,674	10.2	142	6.54	–
2024	ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	2,847	8,950	25,917	2,592	10.0	110	6.98	–
2023	not published	4,450	14,008	38,441	3,631	10.6	116	5.63	–
2022	not published	2,576	8,136	19,237	1,817	10.6	134	5.11	–
2021	not published	4,773	15,079	30,316	2,982	10.2	157	6.11	–
2020	not published	4,085	12,859	28,292	3,202	8.8	144	6.71	–
2019	not published	3,313	10,382	23,572	2,838	8.3	141	6.27	–
2018	not published	2,476	7,733	16,691	2,091	8.0	148	5.18	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	6.54	7.95	−18%	548 of 1,665	DNV	A
2024	ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	6.98	8.06	−13%	675 of 1,787	DNV	A
2023	not published	5.63	8.44	−33%	352 of 1,797	DNV	A
2022	not published	5.11	8.51	−40%	267 of 1,961	DNV	A
2021	not published	6.11	8.86	−31%	424 of 1,789	DNV	A
2020	not published	6.71	9.03	−26%	505 of 1,870	DNV	A
2019	not published	6.27	8.83	−29%	482 of 1,919	DNV	A
2018	not published	5.18	8.86	−42%	306 of 1,779	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.