Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

UAL COLOGNE

IMO: 9681534
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Hoogezand
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NESCOS SHIPPING BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

37.8

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+7%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

39.6

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+55%)

Average speed

9.1 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

473 t

CO₂ emitted

1,485 t

1,508 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

12,510 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,377 h

57 days, 16% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 37.8 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+7%)

17.4Ranks 1,468 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 9.3 (−2%)

6.9Faster than 44% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 39.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+55%)

10.2Ranks 2,211 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU49%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU5%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (902 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

73 t

4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+23 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

UAL COLOGNE
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

UAL COLOGNE
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

UAL COLOGNE
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.8 kn	−1%	+22%	+31%	+46%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.9 kn	−7%	−39%	−50%	−46%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+7%	+5%	−21%	+170%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+9%	+11%	+252%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+0%	−3%	−85%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−10%	−4%	+117%	−29%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	−12%	−6%	+39%	−32%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NESCOS SHIPPING BV	473	1,485	12,510	1,377	9.1	37.8	–	–
2024	NESCOS SHIPPING BV	366	1,149	9,558	1,308	7.3	38.3	–	–
2023	not published	779	2,449	19,018	1,695	11.2	41.0	–	97%
2022	not published	923	2,893	24,030	2,105	11.4	38.4	35.4	21%
2021	not published	241	759	6,831	606	11.3	35.3	41.7	–
2020	not published	1,604	5,038	45,593	3,919	11.6	35.2	39.1	–
2019	not published	825	2,591	21,021	1,934	10.9	39.2	36.9	–
2018	not published	675	2,119	15,074	1,501	10.0	44.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NESCOS SHIPPING BV	39.6	25.5	+55%	2,211 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	NESCOS SHIPPING BV	27.1	19.3	+41%	841 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	50.2	20.7	+143%	981 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	18.6	21.6	−14%	381 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	17.9	22.7	−21%	335 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	19.9	24.5	−19%	358 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	28.0	25.0	+12%	685 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	41.2	24.9	+66%	841 of 1,044	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.