Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SPAR ARIES

IMO: 9701920
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 34,749 t
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.89 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spar Shipping A/S

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,749 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

74.4

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−10%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.74

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−15%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,870 t

CO₂ emitted

5,887 t

5,979 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,137 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,317 h

97 days, 26% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 74.4 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−10%)

61.0Ranks 1,166 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.7 (+1%)

8.8Faster than 58% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.74 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−15%)

4.80Ranks 1,238 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU30%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,589 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SPAR ARIES
Bulk carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SPAR ARIES
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SPAR ARIES
Bulk carrier median

5.06.07.08.09.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+5%	+8%	+17%	−8%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.0 kn	−5%	+17%	+84%	+10%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−11%	−20%	−69%	+15%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	−8%	−22%	+56%	−19%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	−4%	+3%	+159%	+21%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	+10%	−1%	−60%	−16%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	+3%	+12%	−21%	+2%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spar Shipping A/S	1,870	5,887	25,137	2,317	10.8	74.4	6.74	–
2024	Spar Shipping A/S	1,526	4,771	21,498	2,049	10.5	71.0	7.33	–
2023	not published	872	2,749	11,668	1,365	8.5	74.7	6.66	84%
2022	not published	3,128	9,805	37,369	3,903	9.6	83.7	5.80	–
2021	not published	2,194	6,867	24,003	2,130	11.3	91.4	7.14	–
2020	not published	880	2,759	9,282	882	10.5	94.8	5.88	–
2019	not published	1,999	6,266	23,303	1,990	11.7	85.8	6.97	–
2018	not published	2,445	7,682	29,487	2,720	10.8	82.9	6.81	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spar Shipping A/S	6.74	7.89	−15%	1,238 of 3,610	DNV	B+C
2024	Spar Shipping A/S	7.33	8.09	−9%	1,220 of 3,089	DNV	C
2023	not published	6.66	8.27	−19%	1,036 of 3,548	ABS	C
2022	not published	5.80	8.71	−33%	627 of 3,968	ABS	C
2021	not published	7.14	8.57	−17%	1,061 of 3,466	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.88	8.24	−29%	573 of 3,150	ABS	C
2019	not published	6.97	8.38	−17%	1,099 of 3,360	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.81	8.50	−20%	964 of 3,384	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.