Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE MANCHESTER

IMO: 9706748
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,871 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEDI 8.65 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MANCHESTER BRIDGE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: IS CONTAINER PTE. LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 59,871 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

268

Container median 177 kg/nm (+52%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (−14%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

78.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,212 t

CO₂ emitted

10,014 t

10,172 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,973 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

984 h

41 days, 11% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 268 kg/nm · median 177 (+52%)

78.8Ranks 1,793 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 32% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−14%)

7.22Ranks 930 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU94%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU1%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,303 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

142 t

1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+158 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE MANCHESTER
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE MANCHESTER
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE MANCHESTER
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	+6%	−4%	−63%	–	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.0 kn	−1%	−13%	+12%	–	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−14%	−20%	+132%	−31%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−5.0 kn	−6%	−28%	−17%	+1%	5.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.8 kn	+1%	+22%	+15%	−12%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	+12%	+19%	−55%	+18%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	+1%	+4%	−50%	+19%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	IS CONTAINER PTE. LTD.	3,212	10,014	11,973	984	12.2	268	14.0	–
2024	IS CONTAINER PTE. LTD.	8,180	25,531	32,229	2,410	13.4	254	–	–
2023	not published	7,311	22,883	28,659	1,864	15.4	255	7.31	–
2022	not published	3,684	11,631	12,378	752	16.5	298	10.6	–
2021	not published	4,728	14,925	14,947	696	21.5	316	10.5	–
2020	not published	4,067	12,707	12,946	730	17.7	314	11.9	–
2019	not published	8,159	25,439	28,987	1,746	16.6	282	10.1	–
2018	not published	16,124	50,255	57,922	3,592	16.1	278	8.44	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	IS CONTAINER PTE. LTD.	14.0	16.3	−14%	930 of 2,208	ClassNK	A+C
2024	IS CONTAINER PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	7.31	19.4	−62%	186 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	10.6	19.1	−45%	360 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	10.5	17.9	−41%	363 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	11.9	17.6	−32%	501 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	10.1	18.9	−47%	327 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	8.44	20.2	−58%	167 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.