Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MARVEL HAWK

IMO: 9760770
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.72 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Comet Arrow Gas Transport Pte. Ltd.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

193

LNG carrier median 190 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

6.28

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (−12%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

67.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,727 t

CO₂ emitted

37,280 t

44,806 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

71,191 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,921 h

205 days, 56% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 193 kg/nm · median 190 (+1%)

152Ranks 207 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 14.4 (+1%)

11.2Faster than 52% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 6.28 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−12%)

5.06Ranks 153 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (18,987 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

626 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

254.4 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq uplift

+7,526 t

+20.2% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARVEL HAWK
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARVEL HAWK
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MARVEL HAWK
LNG carrier median

0.02.55.07.510.012.5

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−3%	−11%	+253%	+3%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+32%	+34%	+1,558%	+171%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−29%	−24%	−94%	−67%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	+0.3 kn	+28%	+31%	−52%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	−5%	+5%	+71%	+42%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Comet Arrow Gas Transport Pte. Ltd.	13,727	37,280	71,191	4,921	14.5	193	–	–
2024LNG	Comet Arrow Gas Transport Pte. Ltd.	4,012	10,935	20,157	1,281	15.7	199	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	183	466	1,216	78	15.5	151	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	4,033	11,500	19,037	1,303	14.6	212	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	6,551	18,811	39,468	2,764	14.3	166	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	4,027	11,330	23,085	1,780	13.0	174	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Comet Arrow Gas Transport Pte. Ltd.	6.28	7.12	−12%	153 of 386	DNV	A+B+C
2024LNG	Comet Arrow Gas Transport Pte. Ltd.	6.07	7.39	−18%	105 of 312	DNV	A+B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	2.24	9.10	−75%	1 of 355	DNV	A+B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6.74	10.4	−35%	78 of 379	DNV	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8.19	10.7	−24%	60 of 267	DNV	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	5.76	10.9	−47%	16 of 248	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.