Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Comet Arrow Gas Transport Pte. Ltd.your view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Comet Arrow Gas Transport Pte. Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 1 |
| CO₂ emitted | 10,935 t |
| Fuel kg/nm | 199 |
| Average speed | 15.7 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 1.7% |
| Ships burning LNG | 1 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | LNG carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.39
- Comet Arrow Gas Transport Pte. Ltd.6.07 (−18% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin LNG carrier | CO₂ per transport work (volume)g/m³·nm, median ship | vs LNG carrier medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comet Arrow Gas Transport Pte. Ltd. | 1 | 6.07 | −18% | 199 | 15.7 | 1,281 | 1.7% | 1 / 0 |
| Segment median | 7.39 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comet Arrow Gas Transport Pte. Ltd. | DNV (1) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% |
Comet Arrow Gas Transport Pte. Ltd.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARVEL HAWKLNG | 9760770 | LNG carrier | 6.07 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.39 | −18% | 15.7 | 10,935 t | €167k | €0 |
30 of 1 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.