Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

KYRAKATINGO

IMO: 9779965
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 43,755 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.95 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ENESEL S.A. · part of Enesel

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 43,755 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

127

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.14

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+15%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,268 t

CO₂ emitted

13,465 t

13,674 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

33,668 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,034 h

126 days, 35% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 127 kg/nm · median 129 (−1%)

76.1Ranks 804 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 10.7 (+4%)

8.0Faster than 62% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.14 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+15%)

4.51Ranks 986 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU41%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU11%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,568 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,443 t

10.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+209 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KYRAKATINGO
Oil tanker median

110.0120.0130.0140.0150.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KYRAKATINGO
Oil tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KYRAKATINGO
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.6 kn	−13%	+14%	+200%	+16%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.2 kn	+20%	−5%	−80%	+23%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−10%	−8%	+18%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.6 kn	+15%	+0%	−10%	+82%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.8 kn	−16%	−1%	+10%	−38%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	+6%	−5%	+6%	+20%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.7 kn	+3%	+21%	−9%	−11%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ENESEL S.A.	4,268	13,465	33,668	3,034	11.1	127	9.14	–
2024	ENESEL S.A.	1,627	5,193	11,215	1,319	8.5	145	7.90	–
2023	not published	6,926	22,043	57,063	5,315	10.7	121	6.41	–
2022	not published	6,532	20,935	48,460	4,596	10.5	135	8.48	–
2021	not published	6,333	20,146	54,029	4,464	12.1	117	4.66	–
2020	not published	6,846	21,836	49,028	4,759	10.3	140	7.49	–
2019	not published	6,104	19,319	46,247	4,035	11.5	132	6.25	–
2018	not published	6,493	20,634	50,750	5,173	9.8	128	7.00	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ENESEL S.A.	9.14	7.95	+15%	986 of 1,665	DNV	A
2024	ENESEL S.A.	7.90	8.06	−2%	865 of 1,787	DNV	A
2023	not published	6.41	8.44	−24%	528 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	8.48	8.51	−0%	977 of 1,961	DNV	A
2021	not published	4.66	8.86	−47%	166 of 1,789	DNV	A
2020	not published	7.49	9.03	−17%	677 of 1,870	DNV	A
2019	not published	6.25	8.83	−29%	478 of 1,919	DNV	A
2018	not published	7.00	8.86	−21%	584 of 1,779	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.