Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Eneselyour view
Enesel
2 ISM companies in this group, 2025. Untick a company to leave it out of the figures.
- ENESEL S.A.13 ships · same name
- Enesel Dry SA4 ships · same name
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Enesel | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 17 |
| CO₂ emitted | 237,338 t+61.9% |
| Fuel kg/nm | 182 |
| Average speed | 12.2 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Enesel6.37 (−61% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin container | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs container medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enesel | 4 | 6.37 | −61% | 247 | 14.6 | 2,631 | 2.2% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.95
- Enesel4.87 (−39% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin oil tanker | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs oil tanker medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enesel | 13 | 4.87 | −39% | 143 | 11.2 | 2,149 | 8.1% | – |
| Segment median | 7.95 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enesel | DNV (17) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Enesel: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KYRAKATINGO | 9779965 | Oil tanker | 9.14 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | +15% | 11.1 | 13,465 t | €397k | €40k |
| KANARIS 21 | 9889942 | Oil tanker | 7.79 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −2% | 10.1 | 20,463 t | €751k | €0 |
| MIAOULIS 21 | 9886641 | Oil tanker | 6.87 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −14% | 12.0 | 11,665 t | €326k | €0 |
| SOLOMOS | 9933200 | Oil tanker | 5.40 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −32% | 12.7 | 6,023 t | €170k | €0 |
| PALAMAS | 9938042 | Oil tanker | 5.24 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −34% | 11.3 | 7,056 t | €223k | €0 |
| KAPODISTRIAS 21 | 9886639 | Oil tanker | 4.87 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −39% | 11.4 | 11,619 t | €326k | €19k |
| SPARTO | 9865116 | Oil tanker | 4.37 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −45% | 12.7 | 5,905 t | €183k | €0 |
| CAPTAIN LYRISTIS | 9877183 | Oil tanker | 4.34 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −45% | 11.7 | 7,885 t | €216k | €0 |
| AGIOS NIKOLAS | 9845506 | Oil tanker | 4.27 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −46% | 10.0 | 20,590 t | €598k | €0 |
| SEFERIS | 9937024 | Oil tanker | 4.22 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −47% | 11.6 | 4,987 t | €141k | €0 |
| SPYROS | 9877171 | Oil tanker | 3.67 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.95 | −54% | 11.9 | 8,896 t | €250k | €0 |
| NORFOLK EXPRESS | 9665592 | Container | 6.64 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | −59% | 14.4 | 27,461 t | €754k | €0 |
| BALTIMORE EXPRESS | 9665621 | Container | 6.53 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | −60% | 14.6 | 35,674 t | €981k | €0 |
| LOS ANGELES EXPRESS | 9665633 | Container | 6.21 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | −62% | 15.0 | 29,191 t | €803k | €0 |
| SAVANNAH EXPRESS | 9665607 | Container | 6.15 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | −62% | 14.5 | 26,458 t | €727k | €0 |
30 of 17 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.