Navalyze · Container · Ship

BG JADE

IMO: 9803687
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,755 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEDI 18.25 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Juengerhans Heavy-Lift-Fleet Services GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,755 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

89.6

Container median 177 kg/nm (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

36.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+122%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,759 t

CO₂ emitted

11,776 t

11,960 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

41,969 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,161 h

132 days, 36% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 89.6 kg/nm · median 177 (−49%)

78.8Ranks 393 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 13.3 (+0%)

9.1Faster than 49% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 36.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+122%)

7.22Ranks 1,808 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU23%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU19%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,778 t).

Fuel burned laden

2,842 t

76% of all fuel; 24% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,261 t

19.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+184 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BG JADE
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BG JADE
Container median

13.013.514.014.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BG JADE
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+4%	−0%	−13%	+5%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+1%	+8%	+52%	+0%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+1%	−5%	−30%	+5%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−9%	−10%	+3%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+2%	+4%	−11%	+3%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+2%	+5%	−2%	+7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+3%	−2%	+16%	−6%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Juengerhans Heavy-Lift-Fleet Services GmbH & Co. KG	864	2,707	9,845	733	13.4	87.7	38.4	–
2025	Twenty-second New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co KG	3,759	11,776	41,969	3,161	13.3	89.6	36.2	76%
2024	Juengerhans Heavy-Lift-Fleet Services GmbH & Co. KG	4,141	12,961	48,154	3,471	13.9	86.0	34.4	–
2023	not published	2,691	8,426	31,748	2,445	13.0	84.8	34.3	–
2022	not published	3,787	11,843	45,295	3,271	13.8	83.6	32.5	–
2021	not published	4,003	12,541	43,794	3,122	14.0	91.4	37.3	–
2020	not published	4,429	13,863	49,353	3,594	13.7	89.7	36.2	–
2019	not published	4,451	13,931	50,488	3,798	13.3	88.2	33.9	–
2018	not published	3,720	11,652	43,377	3,107	14.0	85.8	36.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Juengerhans Heavy-Lift-Fleet Services GmbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2025	Twenty-second New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co KG	36.2	16.3	+122%	1,808 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	Juengerhans Heavy-Lift-Fleet Services GmbH & Co. KG	34.4	17.5	+96%	1,538 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	34.3	19.4	+77%	1,438 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	32.5	19.1	+70%	1,351 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	37.3	17.9	+108%	1,443 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	36.2	17.6	+106%	1,423 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	33.9	18.9	+80%	1,328 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	36.1	20.2	+79%	1,274 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.