Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

HUFTARØY

IMO: 9825805
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Torghatten Nord AS · part of Torghatten

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

41.2

Ro-pax median 150 kg/nm (−73%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

88.6

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−84%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,064

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+320%)

Average speed

15.5 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,129 t

CO₂ emitted

11,059 t

14,182 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

100,196 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,457 h

269 days, 74% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 41.2 kg/nm · median 150 (−73%)

69.3Ranks 14 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 15.8 (−2%)

12.0Faster than 46% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 88.6 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−84%)

66.8Ranks 60 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,064 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+320%)

48.6Ranks 353 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports98%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (11,059 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

230 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

107.4 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq uplift

+3,123 t

+28.2% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HUFTARØY
Ro-pax median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HUFTARØY
Ro-pax median

14.015.016.017.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

HUFTARØY
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

HUFTARØY
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+4%	+3%	+5%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.1 kn	+3%	−3%	−5%	−95%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−2%	+1%	−1%	−16%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	−1%	+5%	+9%	−15%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2021	+1.1 kn	−12%	−6%	+32%	+33%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	4,129	11,059	100,196	6,457	15.5	41.2	–	–
2024LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	3,791	10,155	95,430	6,161	15.5	39.7	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	3,840	10,560	99,929	6,020	16.6	38.4	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	3,973	10,925	101,449	6,291	16.1	39.2	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	3,703	10,183	93,438	6,112	15.3	39.6	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	3,184	8,755	70,522	4,970	14.2	45.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	88.6	567	−84%	60 of 408	1,064	253	+320%	DNV	A
2024LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	89.6	547	−84%	65 of 404	1,074	233	+361%	DNV	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	1,759	680	+159%	349 of 386	1,249	234	+434%	DNV	B
2022LNG / alt.	not published	2,103	626	+236%	372 of 394	1,348	253	+433%	DNV	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	2,484	815	+205%	347 of 377	2,837	226	+1,155%	DNV	B
2019LNG / alt.	not published	1,865	569	+228%	361 of 394	1,045	223	+370%	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.