Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

FÆRØY

IMO: 9825829
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Torghatten Nord AS · part of Torghatten

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

43.0

Ro-pax median 150 kg/nm (−71%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

63.7

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−89%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,114

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+340%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,574 t

CO₂ emitted

6,894 t

8,840 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

59,888 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,795 h

158 days, 43% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 43.0 kg/nm · median 150 (−71%)

69.3Ranks 18 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 15.8 (+0%)

12.0Faster than 50% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 63.7 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−89%)

66.8Ranks 37 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,114 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+340%)

48.6Ranks 358 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports98%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,894 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

139 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

66.9 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq uplift

+1,946 t

+28.2% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FÆRØY
Ro-pax median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FÆRØY
Ro-pax median

15.516.016.517.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

FÆRØY
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,5002,0002,500

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

FÆRØY
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+7%	+7%	−7%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+4%	−1%	−2%	+0%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−4%	−1%	+8%	−11%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−9%	−9%	−1%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+2%	−1%	−11%	−10%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−2%	+4%	+47%	+40%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	2,574	6,894	59,888	3,795	15.8	43.0	–	–
2024LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	2,591	6,939	64,344	4,096	15.7	40.3	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	2,532	6,962	65,457	3,945	16.6	38.7	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	2,447	6,730	60,803	3,802	16.0	40.2	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	2,727	7,499	61,491	3,860	15.9	44.4	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,989	8,221	68,815	4,198	16.4	43.4	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	2,072	5,698	46,874	3,024	15.5	44.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	63.7	567	−89%	37 of 408	1,114	253	+340%	DNV	A
2024LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	70.3	547	−87%	52 of 404	1,053	233	+352%	DNV	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	70.2	680	−90%	37 of 386	1,161	234	+396%	DNV	B
2022LNG / alt.	not published	79.3	626	−87%	47 of 394	1,288	253	+409%	DNV	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	103	815	−87%	66 of 377	2,024	226	+796%	DNV	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	114	751	−85%	79 of 387	1,494	217	+587%	DNV	B
2019LNG / alt.	not published	81.7	569	−86%	66 of 394	991	223	+345%	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.